https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=486605
--- Comment #5 from Synthetic451 ---
I am definitely okay with this. Would help my workflow a lot.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=486605
--- Comment #4 from Nate Graham ---
I would also lean towards putting it in the Screen Locking KCM. It would slot
right into the existing UI quite nicely:
> Lock screen automatically: [After some durationv]
>[x] After
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=486605
--- Comment #3 from Jakob Petsovits ---
(In reply to Synthetic451 from comment #2)
> 2. But, having it in a power profile means that a user can configure a
> different locking experience for docked / undocked modes. Like if I am in
> the office and
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=486605
--- Comment #2 from Synthetic451 ---
I think personally I am okay with either way, they both have pros and cons.
1. If its in screen locking, it's an easier UI choice I think. That setting
controls lock screen behavior it should be in Screen Locking
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=486605
Jakob Petsovits changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REPORTED|CONFIRMED
Ever confirmed|0
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=486605
Nate Graham changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kmcwilliampub...@gmail.com
--
You are receiving
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=486605
Nate Graham changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|general |kcm_screenlocker
Severity|normal
