https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=356174
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||s...@gentoo.org
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=356174
Paul Floyd changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pjfl...@wanadoo.fr
--
You are receiving this
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=356174
Ivo Raisr changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||iv...@ivosh.net
--
You are
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=356174
--- Comment #16 from Philippe Waroquiers ---
(In reply to Daniel Trebbien from comment #15)
> Looking through the sources of the release_35 and release_36 branches, I see
> that LLDB 3.5 and 3.6 do not support the
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=356174
Daniel Trebbien changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #95906|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=356174
--- Comment #14 from Daniel Trebbien ---
(In reply to Philippe Waroquiers from comment #13)
> On debina8/x86, when using --vgdb-shadow-registers=yes, valgrind gdbserver
> reports
> qXfer:features:read+;
> but lldb 3.5.0 does not
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=356174
--- Comment #15 from Daniel Trebbien ---
Looking through the sources of the release_35 and release_36 branches, I see
that LLDB 3.5 and 3.6 do not support the target.xml or target definition file
ways of specifying register
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=356174
--- Comment #10 from Daniel Trebbien ---
(In reply to Philippe Waroquiers from comment #9)
> Otherwise, valgrind gdbserver expects that the debugger knows the register
> layout of x86 or amd64.
I think that this is what is causing
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=356174
Daniel Trebbien changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #95898|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=356174
--- Comment #9 from Philippe Waroquiers ---
An additional note: on x86 linux, valgrind gdbserver only reports the
Xfer:features:read+
supported if --vgdb-shadow-registers=yes is given.
On amd64 linux,
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=356174
--- Comment #5 from Daniel Trebbien ---
I contacted Apple Developer Relations about the crash and they informed me that
unlike gdb, lldb does not have an initial target definition set, and relies on
the gdbserver to tell it which
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=356174
Philippe Waroquiers changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=356174
--- Comment #3 from Daniel Trebbien ---
The two patches allow LLDB 3.4, 3.5, and 3.6 to debug using the embedded
gdbserver on an Ubuntu 14.04.3 'Trusty Tahr' system.
The crash on Mac has the following backtrace:
```
Thread 5
13 matches
Mail list logo