[valgrind] [Bug 366035] valgrind misses buffer overflow, segfaults in malloc in localtime

2016-09-14 Thread Frederick Eaton via KDE Bugzilla
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=366035 --- Comment #14 from Frederick Eaton --- On Arch Linux, I think the only non-obvious packages needed to make the example compile are alsa-lib and libsndfile ... -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug

[valgrind] [Bug 366035] valgrind misses buffer overflow, segfaults in malloc in localtime

2016-09-14 Thread Philippe Waroquiers via KDE Bugzilla
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=366035 --- Comment #13 from Philippe Waroquiers --- (In reply to Julian Seward from comment #12) > Philippe, is there anything we can or should do here? The current hypothesis is that an ioctl used by alsa or a sound library is

[valgrind] [Bug 366035] valgrind misses buffer overflow, segfaults in malloc in localtime

2016-09-14 Thread Julian Seward via KDE Bugzilla
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=366035 --- Comment #12 from Julian Seward --- Philippe, is there anything we can or should do here? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

[valgrind] [Bug 366035] valgrind misses buffer overflow, segfaults in malloc in localtime

2016-07-28 Thread Frederick Eaton via KDE Bugzilla
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=366035 Frederick Eaton changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #100267|0 |1 is obsolete|

[valgrind] [Bug 366035] valgrind misses buffer overflow, segfaults in malloc in localtime

2016-07-28 Thread Frederick Eaton via KDE Bugzilla
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=366035 --- Comment #10 from Frederick Eaton --- Hi Philippe, Thanks for the suggestions. I'm afraid I don't have time to fix the full bug, and I think whoever updates syswrap-linux.c will want to have a working version of the bug to

[valgrind] [Bug 366035] valgrind misses buffer overflow, segfaults in malloc in localtime

2016-07-28 Thread Philippe Waroquiers via KDE Bugzilla
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=366035 --- Comment #9 from Philippe Waroquiers --- > I hope it helps too! What do you want me to do now? Is there some > other tracing facility which I should run to help you identify the > problematic ioctl? Do you want me to

[valgrind] [Bug 366035] valgrind misses buffer overflow, segfaults in malloc in localtime

2016-07-26 Thread Frederick Eaton via KDE Bugzilla
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=366035 --- Comment #8 from Frederick Eaton --- > Forcing the channel to 1 at that 'BUG' place has other consequences than just > allocating a 'too small' buffer. > As I understand, after this 'forcing to 1', we will also have >

[valgrind] [Bug 366035] valgrind misses buffer overflow, segfaults in malloc in localtime

2016-07-26 Thread Philippe Waroquiers via KDE Bugzilla
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=366035 --- Comment #7 from Philippe Waroquiers --- (In reply to Frederick Eaton from comment #6) > Hi Philippe, > > Thanks for responding. > > I'm using Arch Linux, it's weird that the default Arch package is not > to your

[valgrind] [Bug 366035] valgrind misses buffer overflow, segfaults in malloc in localtime

2016-07-26 Thread Frederick Eaton via KDE Bugzilla
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=366035 Frederick Eaton changed: What|Removed |Added CC||frede...@ofb.net -- You

[valgrind] [Bug 366035] valgrind misses buffer overflow, segfaults in malloc in localtime

2016-07-26 Thread Frederick Eaton via KDE Bugzilla
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=366035 --- Comment #6 from Frederick Eaton --- Hi Philippe, Thanks for responding. I'm using Arch Linux, it's weird that the default Arch package is not to your liking. Well I compiled from ABS adding (!strip debug) to OPTIONS in

[valgrind] [Bug 366035] valgrind misses buffer overflow, segfaults in malloc in localtime

2016-07-26 Thread Frederick Eaton via KDE Bugzilla
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=366035 --- Comment #5 from Frederick Eaton --- Created attachment 100309 --> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=100309=edit verbose output -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

[valgrind] [Bug 366035] valgrind misses buffer overflow, segfaults in malloc in localtime

2016-07-26 Thread Frederick Eaton via KDE Bugzilla
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=366035 Frederick Eaton changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #100269|0 |1 is obsolete|

[valgrind] [Bug 366035] valgrind misses buffer overflow, segfaults in malloc in localtime

2016-07-25 Thread Philippe Waroquiers via KDE Bugzilla
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=366035 Philippe Waroquiers changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[valgrind] [Bug 366035] valgrind misses buffer overflow, segfaults in malloc in localtime

2016-07-24 Thread Frederick Eaton via KDE Bugzilla
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=366035 --- Comment #2 from Frederick Eaton --- Created attachment 100269 --> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=100269=edit output file only -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

[valgrind] [Bug 366035] valgrind misses buffer overflow, segfaults in malloc in localtime

2016-07-24 Thread Frederick Eaton via KDE Bugzilla
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=366035 --- Comment #1 from Frederick Eaton --- Created attachment 100267 --> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=100267=edit code and output file You are welcome to critique my coding style. -- You are receiving this mail because: