https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=367995
--- Comment #23 from Philippe Waroquiers ---
See some follow up in bug 375415
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=367995
Ivo Raisr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Latest Commit||15985
--- Comment #22 from Ivo
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=367995
--- Comment #21 from Ivo Raisr ---
Ruurd, would you like to provide an implementation of VG_(HT_remove_at_Iter)()?
If yes, please create a new bug for tracking it.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=367995
Ivo Raisr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=367995
--- Comment #19 from Philippe Waroquiers ---
(In reply to Ivo Raisr from comment #17)
> I will take care of the integration if Philippe is ok with it.
As indicated in comment 18, I think we can avoid relatively
easily the
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=367995
--- Comment #18 from Philippe Waroquiers ---
(In reply to Ruurd Beerstra from comment #15)
Thanks for all your work on this, I think this is useful
(I have not yet looked in depth, but I think this might be used
for the
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=367995
--- Comment #17 from Ivo Raisr ---
I will take care of the integration if Philippe is ok with it.
Things which need to be done:
- update NEWS
- mark the filter script as executable for svn
- mark the compiled binary as ignored for svn
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=367995
--- Comment #16 from Julian Seward ---
Philippe, thank you for looking at this. And Ruurd, for your patience.
> The overhead is only incurred by custom allocators using the auto-free
> feature,
> not by any existing applications or
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=367995
--- Comment #15 from Ruurd Beerstra ---
Hi,
Thank you for reviewing the patch.
>--- Comment #14 from Philippe Waroquiers ---
>Quickly read the last
>version of the patch, sorry for entering
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=367995
Philippe Waroquiers changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
Ruurd
-Original Message-
From: Ruurd Beerstra
Sent: Tuesday, September 20, 2016 16:55
To: 'bug-cont...@bugs.kde.org' <bug-cont...@bugs.kde.org>
Subject: RE: [valgrind] [Bug 367995] Integration of memcheck with custom memory
allocator
Hi,
Answers between the text below...
>-O
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=367995
--- Comment #12 from Ivo Raisr ---
Thank you for your review, Julian.
1) I will let Ruurd comment on this.
2) a+b is addressed in the new patch v3 (attached).
3) I was not able to come up with an efficient way how to express this
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=367995
--- Comment #11 from Ruurd Beerstra ---
Hi,
Answers between the text below...
>-Original Message-
>From: Julian Seward via KDE Bugzilla [mailto:bugzilla_nore...@kde.org]
>Sent: Tuesday, September 20, 2016 12:47
>
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=367995
Ivo Raisr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #101103|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=367995
--- Comment #9 from Julian Seward ---
Ivo, thank you for reviewing this; Ruurd, thank you for addressing
Ivo's comments.
I looked at the revised patch. I am generally a bit nervous about
mempool changes given that they are not much
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=367995
--- Comment #8 from Ivo Raisr ---
The attached patch is ready to land.
Regression tests pass on x86/Linux, amd64/Linux (Ubuntu), x86/Solaris and
amd64/Solaris.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=367995
Ivo Raisr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #100849|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=367995
--- Comment #5 from Ruurd Beerstra ---
Hi,
Thank you for taking the time to look (very thoroughly) into this.
>--- Comment #1 from Ivo Raisr --- Thank you for the patch
>and specially for regression
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=367995
Julian Seward changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jsew...@acm.org
--- Comment
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=367995
--- Comment #2 from Ivo Raisr ---
Also when running the newly introduced regressions tests, I encountered this
failure:
$ cat memcheck/tests/leak-autofreepool-5.stderr.diff
--- leak-autofreepool-5.stderr.exp 2016-08-31
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=367995
Ivo Raisr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |CONFIRMED
Ever confirmed|0
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=367995
Ivo Raisr changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||iv...@ivosh.net
22 matches
Mail list logo