https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=369509
Petr Pavlu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||enpen...@gmail.com
--- Comment #12 from Petr Pavlu
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=369509
Julian Seward changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|REPORTED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=369509
Julian Seward changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||414270
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugs.kde.org/
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=369509
Julian Seward changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #123930|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=369509
Julian Seward changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #123537|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=369509
--- Comment #10 from ahashmi ---
I think we should move further discussion about h/w capabilities
detection to https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=414268
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=369509
--- Comment #9 from ahashmi ---
Thanks for the SIGILL warning. I forgot the erratum/kernel dependencies!
I don't know how often that's an issue in practical terms but it's best
to be safe.
Alex Benee also pointed me to the MRS CPU features register met
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=369509
Peter Maydell changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||peter.mayd...@linaro.org
--- Comment #8 from Pe
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=369509
--- Comment #7 from ahashmi ---
> The 413547 patch does the hw capabilities detection needed to decide
> which regtests to run, and it looks like you've successfully added the
> relevant bits for AArch64. But it doesn't do those tests for Valgrind
> its
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=369509
--- Comment #6 from Julian Seward ---
> > My only big concern here is the lack of hwcaps support in Vex/Valgrind.
> > That could be done in a followup bug, but it needs to happen fairly
> > soon.
>
> Sorry, I'm not clear about this. Do you mean we need
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=369509
--- Comment #5 from ahashmi ---
Created attachment 123934
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=123934&action=edit
Patch implements and tests Arm v8.1 LSE atomics (addresses second set of review
comments)
Thanks for the explanation. I think I un
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=369509
--- Comment #4 from Julian Seward ---
(In reply to ahashmi from comment #3)
I'll reply about the hwcaps a bit later.
Regarding CasCmpNE64: the underlying problem is like this. If the
location is not contended (which is almost always the case), then
t
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=369509
--- Comment #3 from ahashmi ---
Created attachment 123930
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=123930&action=edit
Patch implements and tests Arm v8.1 LSE atomics (addresses first set of review
comments)
Thanks for reviewing. New patch attached
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=369509
Julian Seward changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jsew...@acm.org
--- Comment #2 from Julian Sewa
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=369509
ahashmi changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|FIXED |---
Status|RESOLVED|R
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=369509
ahashmi changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|REPORTED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=369509
--- Comment #1 from ahashmi ---
Created attachment 123537
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=123537&action=edit
Patch implements and tests Arm v8.1 LSE atomics
This patch implements ARMv8.1 memory atomics in VEX/priv/guest_arm64_toIR.c and
te
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=369509
ahashmi changed:
What|Removed |Added
Platform|Other |Compiled Sources
Version|3.12 SVN
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=369509
alex.ben...@linaro.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||alex.ben...@linaro.org
--
You are rece
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=369509
ahashmi changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||assad.has...@linaro.org
Assignee|jsew...@ac
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=369509
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|ARMv8.1 LSE instructions|ARMv8.1-a LSE instructions
|a
21 matches
Mail list logo
