https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=398649
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|CONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=398649
Julian Seward changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jsew...@acm.org
--- Comment #5 from Julian Sewa
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=398649
Vadim Barkov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vbr...@gmail.com
Status|REPORTED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=398649
--- Comment #3 from Dirk Mueller ---
No, I wasn't. ok, nevermind.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=398649
--- Comment #2 from Mark Wielaard ---
It looks the same, but binutils 2.31 certainly should be new enough, it was
released this year. Are you sure you are using 2.31?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=398649
--- Comment #1 from Dirk Mueller ---
I see a similar issue with binutils 2.31 and gcc 8.2.1, is this the same cause?
(error is from compiling 3.14.0):
[ 106s] priv/guest_s390_helpers.c: In function 's390x_dirtyhelper_vec_op':
[ 106s] priv/guest_s390_
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=398649
Andreas Arnez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ar...@linux.ibm.com
--
You are receiving this
