https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=460985
Nate Graham changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bugs.kde.org/show_b
|
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=460985
Nate Graham changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Version Fixed In|
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=460985
Oded Arbel changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||o...@geek.co.il
--- Comment #39 from Oded Arbel -
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=460985
--- Comment #38 from beedell.rokejulianlockhart
---
(In reply to Nate Graham from comment #37)
> Yes. If you're still seeing the portal dialog in non-portal-using apps,
> please talk to your distro packagers about it. This isn't the place for
> that, a
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=460985
--- Comment #37 from Nate Graham ---
Yes. If you're still seeing the portal dialog in non-portal-using apps, please
talk to your distro packagers about it. This isn't the place for that, as it's
about adding a specific feature to the new portal dialog.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=460985
--- Comment #36 from beedell.rokejulianlockhart
---
(In reply to H.H. from comment #35)
> When will this be fixed? Is there the possibility to change back to the old
> dialog in dolphin? I often use it to enter something like "java -jar" or
> "somethin
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=460985
H.H. changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||cyberb...@gmx.de
--- Comment #35 from H.H. ---
When wil
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=460985
Nate Graham changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||peterka...@gmail.com
--- Comment #34 from Nate Gr
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=460985
beedell.rokejulianlockhart changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rokejulianlockhart@outlook.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=460985
--- Comment #33 from Rodrigo Pedra Brum ---
Thank you all =)
Maybe for Plasma 6 the mockup I made could be taken into consideration. Not
necessarily the mockup, but the idea.
I think it would be a clear way to separate both concepts, whilst reducing t
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=460985
Nate Graham changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|VHI |NOR
--- Comment #32 from Nate Graham ---
Lowerin
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=460985
--- Comment #31 from Nate Graham ---
Git commit 1ca959de772e949ca8ab55ed41827ea796be1da8 by Nate Graham.
Committed on 28/02/2023 at 15:53.
Pushed by ngraham into branch 'Plasma/5.27'.
Revert "extend kio with portal-based open-with implementation"
This
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=460985
--- Comment #30 from Nate Graham ---
Yes, it's included in that patch.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=460985
--- Comment #29 from Ilia Kats ---
This one also needs to be reverted then:
https://invent.kde.org/plasma/plasma-integration/-/commit/bc1c5d66828429904ea9820154b72307d26a8529
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=460985
--- Comment #28 from Bug Janitor Service ---
A possibly relevant merge request was started @
https://invent.kde.org/plasma/plasma-integration/-/merge_requests/73
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=460985
--- Comment #27 from Christian (Fuchs) ---
(In reply to Christian (Fuchs) from comment #26)
> I'd +1 reverting delaying switching over until 6.* which is a major new
> version and "breaking" changes are less of an issue, plus it will get
> frequent fea
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=460985
--- Comment #26 from Christian (Fuchs) ---
(In reply to Nate Graham from comment #25)
> Rodrigo, I'm starting to come to that conclusion myself. Perhaps the
> switchover was premature, and we can delay it until we have all the missing
> features from th
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=460985
--- Comment #25 from Nate Graham ---
Rodrigo, I'm starting to come to that conclusion myself. Perhaps the switchover
was premature, and we can delay it until we have all the missing features from
the old dialog implemented in the new one. I plan to look
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=460985
--- Comment #24 from Rodrigo Pedra Brum ---
Created attachment 156816
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=156816&action=edit
mockup of additional option on open with menu
I made a mockup of what could be an additional option on open with menu
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=460985
Rodrigo Pedra Brum changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rodrigo.pe...@gmail.com
--- Comment #23 fr
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=460985
pmw...@protonmail.ch changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pmw...@protonmail.ch
--
You are receivin
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=460985
Claudius changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||claudius+kde@hausnetz.lette
|
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=460985
--- Comment #21 from Christian (Fuchs) ---
As an addition to the "does it create a .desktop file" if you choose a custom
binary:
imho either no, as things should be explicit and not implicit, or yes, but only
when you check a
[x] always open $filetyp
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=460985
--- Comment #20 from Ilia Kats ---
Perhaps the "mode" (binary vs. .desktop) could be made more explicit by
displaying what the dialog will do somewhere, but I don't want to have to click
an extra button or, worse, manually pick a binary with file choose
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=460985
--- Comment #19 from Nate Graham ---
I agree that the portal dialog should gain the feature, to achieve parity with
the older widgets dialog.
I'd very much like the UI for it to be explicit, though; like an Open with
terminal command or script" button.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=460985
--- Comment #18 from Christian (Fuchs) ---
(In reply to Harald Sitter from comment #14)
> Same question for your proposal
>
> What happens when one has picked a file or entered the path and hit enter?
> Does it just open with that file?
I think the o
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=460985
--- Comment #17 from Christoph Feck ---
All entries I have in ~/.local/share were created by the old dialog when adding
a custom binary. At I cannot remember I ever wrote a .desktop file by hand :)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watch
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=460985
--- Comment #16 from Nate Graham ---
That seems like a separate bug that needs to be fixed, and working around that
bug by choosing custom binaries isn't ideal. :)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=460985
--- Comment #15 from Christoph Feck ---
The portal dialog ignores .desktop files in ~/.local/share/applications/
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=460985
--- Comment #14 from Harald Sitter ---
Same question for your proposal
What happens when one has picked a file or entered the path and hit enter? Does
it just open with that file? Or maybe add it to the model?
What I don't get btw, why do you have ap
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=460985
Ilia Kats changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ilia-k...@gmx.net
--- Comment #13 from Ilia Kats -
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=460985
--- Comment #12 from Harald Sitter ---
(In reply to Christian (Fuchs) from comment #8)
> (In reply to Harald Sitter from comment #7)
> > It's provided by us, by the product of this bug report in fact :)
> >
> > What should the UI for this look like? Wr
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=460985
--- Comment #11 from Christian (Fuchs) ---
(In reply to Nate Graham from comment #10)
> Oops.
I'd say this needs fixing urgently, but unfortunately we probably can't within
the 27er release, and given there is no 28 and some distributions are probably
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=460985
Nate Graham changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|NOR |VHI
--- Comment #10 from Nate Graham ---
Oops.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=460985
--- Comment #9 from Christian (Fuchs) ---
It seems 5.27 got released without this, so if you as a user now need to open a
certain file with a custom application, you simply can't.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug change
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=460985
--- Comment #8 from Christian (Fuchs) ---
(In reply to Harald Sitter from comment #7)
> It's provided by us, by the product of this bug report in fact :)
>
> What should the UI for this look like? Writing the code is surely not the
> problem here.
Per
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=460985
--- Comment #7 from Harald Sitter ---
It's provided by us, by the product of this bug report in fact :)
What should the UI for this look like? Writing the code is surely not the
problem here.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching a
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=460985
Christoph Feck changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||cf...@kde.org
--- Comment #6 from Christoph Fe
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=460985
--- Comment #5 from Nate Graham ---
Yes, that's the expected state of affairs when called from a sandboxed app.
When it's called from a non-sandboxed app like Dolphin or Plasma Folder View,
it inappropriately shows all apps, not just the default and rec
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=460985
--- Comment #4 from Ilya Bizyaev ---
UPD: Tested with Telegram, can confirm that there's now a switch next to the
search bar to choose between only matching and all installed apps. No need for
a separate bug report, after all :)
--
You are receiving t
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=460985
--- Comment #3 from Ilya Bizyaev ---
Which app do you use to test this dialog?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=460985
--- Comment #2 from Nate Graham ---
That's not relevant to this bug report, and I can't reproduce it; for me, the
portal-based dialog *always* shows all apps in it.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=460985
Ilya Bizyaev changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bizy...@zoho.com
--- Comment #1 from Ilya Bizyae
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=460985
Nate Graham changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REPORTED|CONFIRMED
CC|
44 matches
Mail list logo
