https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=429859
Igor Kushnir changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Latest Commit
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=449793
Igor Kushnir changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REPORTED|RESOLVED
Resolution
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=429859
Igor Kushnir changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jarmo.tii...@gmail.com
--- Comment #3 from Igor
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=450094
Igor Kushnir changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||igor...@gmail.com
--- Comment #1 from Igor
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=450316
Igor Kushnir changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||igor...@gmail.com
--- Comment #1 from Igor
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=450316
Igor Kushnir changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REPORTED|RESOLVED
Resolution
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=435235
Igor Kushnir changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ekigw...@gmail.com
--- Comment #4 from Igor
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=435235
Igor Kushnir changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aar...@doofus.org
--- Comment #7 from Igor
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=454430
Igor Kushnir changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||igor...@gmail.com
Resolution
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=452766
--- Comment #3 from Igor Kushnir ---
> I think i need this in daily life and this bug reduces productivity.
Fortunately KDevelop is free software. You can implement the feature to boost
productivity.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=454685
Igor Kushnir changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||igor...@gmail.com
--- Comment #2 from Igor
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=438249
Igor Kushnir changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||igor...@gmail.com
--- Comment #3 from Igor
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=438249
--- Comment #5 from Igor Kushnir ---
> Hi, I assume the workaround was applying this patch:
Yes, thank you for confirming.
Since blaming some specific LLVM versions does not figure, we need to find
something else in common that may be the root ca
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=438249
--- Comment #7 from Igor Kushnir ---
Could someone try to get the backtrace of this crash with assertions enabled?
(NDEBUG not defined)
When I navigate through the crash call stacks from
https://code.woboq.org/llvm/clang/tools/libclang/CXType.cpp.html
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=438249
--- Comment #8 from Igor Kushnir ---
(In reply to Igor Kushnir from comment #7)
> Could someone try to get the backtrace of this crash with assertions
> enabled? (NDEBUG not defined)
I mean: assertions enabled/NDEBUG not defined while building
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=454685
Igor Kushnir changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|REPORTED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=438249
--- Comment #9 from Igor Kushnir ---
*** Bug 454685 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=431811
Igor Kushnir changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|FIXED |DUPLICATE
--- Comment #5 from Igor Kushnir
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=438249
Igor Kushnir changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kogiokkaf...@gmail.com
--- Comment #10 from
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=438249
--- Comment #13 from Igor Kushnir ---
> Delays in responding to your problem solving request.
This is not an urgent request. No need to apologize for a delay so verbosely :)
> "No ffs implementation found"
No idea about this, sor
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=438249
--- Comment #15 from Igor Kushnir ---
> Assertion `!isValueDependent() && "Expression evaluator can't be called on a
> dependent expression."' failed.
Thanks for checking this so quickly!
This must really b
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=438249
--- Comment #19 from Igor Kushnir ---
(In reply to Andrei Slavoiu from comment #17)
> No, not std::string. boost::string. Found the culprit:
>
> //This is the structure controlling a long string
>struct long_t
>{
&g
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=438249
--- Comment #21 from Igor Kushnir ---
If you want to play with this some more, you could try building Clang 13 with
assertions enabled and see if the assertion is triggered. If yes, then the
absence of the crash is accidental. If the assertion does not
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=438249
--- Comment #23 from Igor Kushnir ---
> Hah, good point. The assert fails on clang-13 as well when built with DEBUG.
> Probably on 13 it just happened to return some junk instead of crashing.
What bit width does it return?
> Perhaps clang::
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=438249
--- Comment #25 from Igor Kushnir ---
> Compiled clang-13 back without DEBUG and now I get the same crash with it as
> well.
Perhaps the crash started occurring because of the toolchain
(g++/libstdc++/glibc) upgrade or different comper flags, not
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=455533
Igor Kushnir changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||igor...@gmail.com
--- Comment #1 from Igor
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=465687
Igor Kushnir changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||igor...@gmail.com
--- Comment #1 from Igor
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=465640
Igor Kushnir changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||igor...@gmail.com
--- Comment #1 from Igor
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=373536
Igor Kushnir changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||igor...@gmail.com
Resolution
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=466165
Igor Kushnir changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||igor...@gmail.com
--- Comment #1 from Igor
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=438249
--- Comment #28 from Igor Kushnir ---
(In reply to Arthur Gruzauskas from comment #27)
> Happy to supply any info, or do any suggested bug hunting.
Someone has to propose a LLVM fix and get it in. I plan to do so if I manage to
reproduce the
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=466791
Igor Kushnir changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REPORTED|RESOLVED
Resolution
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=438249
Igor Kushnir changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anonymous11oneeleven@gmail
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=466826
Igor Kushnir changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||igor...@gmail.com
--- Comment #1 from Igor
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=466826
--- Comment #2 from Igor Kushnir ---
There *is* , and support, but only in file templates, not
app templates:
https://invent.kde.org/kdevelop/kdevelop/-/blob/333b00441f10b8c4f8af35405d20338356fb14a9/plugins/filetemplates/licensepage.cpp#L242
--
You
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=438249
Igor Kushnir changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|REPORTED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=466975
Igor Kushnir changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||igor...@gmail.com
--- Comment #3 from Igor
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=466975
Igor Kushnir changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REPORTED|RESOLVED
Resolution
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=438249
Igor Kushnir changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nm...@yandex.com
--- Comment #31 from Igor
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=466826
Igor Kushnir changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |NOT A BUG
Status|REPORTED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=438249
Igor Kushnir changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|CONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=438249
--- Comment #33 from Igor Kushnir ---
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/4d55a0b512a17dfaa2461b8803d37b79f6c9691d
has been reverted and replaced with
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/48fb6659610a3177e8606681046dfa0d19f67203,
which
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=467452
Igor Kushnir changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|REPORTED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=467452
Igor Kushnir changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Latest Commit
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=376716
Igor Kushnir changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||igor...@gmail.com
--- Comment #7 from Igor
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=376716
--- Comment #9 from Igor Kushnir ---
(In reply to Artur from comment #8)
> The best workaround will be something like this:
> `
> alias kdev='rm -r .cache/kdevelop/ && kdev'
> `
>
> So how to properly clea
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=376716
--- Comment #11 from Igor Kushnir ---
Did you try creating a new session?
(In reply to Artur from comment #10)
> "There are many"
> Can You give a concrete answer? I don't want to delete
> '~/.config/kdeveloprc' and
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=467980
Igor Kushnir changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||igor...@gmail.com
--- Comment #1 from Igor
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=467980
--- Comment #4 from Igor Kushnir ---
(In reply to Marek Witkowski from comment #2)
> Created attachment 157744 [details]
> kdevelop process with GDB and printing the backtrace of all threads
QTimerInfoList::unregisterTimer(int) is unlikely t
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=468455
Igor Kushnir changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REPORTED|RESOLVED
Resolution
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=435235
Igor Kushnir changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||o...@senarclens.eu
--- Comment #11 from Igor
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=468595
Igor Kushnir changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REPORTED|NEEDSINFO
CC
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=468596
Igor Kushnir changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||igor...@gmail.com
--- Comment #1 from Igor
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=468595
--- Comment #3 from Igor Kushnir ---
Try in a new KDevelop session. Save under different filenames, extensions, on
different disks. Try as a different user as some configuration can be the
culprit.
Is this a very recent regression? In KDevelop or its
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=468595
Igor Kushnir changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEEDSINFO |CONFIRMED
Ever confirmed|0
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=468605
Igor Kushnir changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REPORTED|CONFIRMED
Ever confirmed|0
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=460870
Igor Kushnir changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bugs.kde.org/show_b
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=468703
Igor Kushnir changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REPORTED|CONFIRMED
CC
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=469938
Igor Kushnir changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||igor...@gmail.com
--- Comment #1 from Igor
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=469938
Igor Kushnir changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REPORTED|NEEDSINFO
Resolution
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=470049
Igor Kushnir changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INTENTIONAL
Status|REPORTED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=470428
Igor Kushnir changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |WORKSFORME
Status|REPORTED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=470428
Igor Kushnir changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEEDSINFO |RESOLVED
--- Comment #5 from Igor Kushnir
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=470685
Igor Kushnir changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||igor...@gmail.com
--- Comment #1 from Igor
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=470966
Igor Kushnir changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REPORTED|CONFIRMED
Ever confirmed|0
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=468605
--- Comment #3 from Igor Kushnir ---
(In reply to Alessandro Carinelli from comment #2)
> Checking that m_results->Numresults is also different from 1 on line 984
> seems to fix the issue but I have no idea about what this variable
> repr
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=468605
--- Comment #4 from Igor Kushnir ---
Also take a look at related functions in include/clang-c/CXDiagnostic.h (or
include/clang-c/Index.h). For example, I think clang_getDiagnosticSpelling()
can potentially clarify the meaning of the single completion
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=468605
--- Comment #6 from Igor Kushnir ---
Created attachment 158431
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=158431&action=edit
Patch to print completion info and assist in investigation
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=468605
--- Comment #7 from Igor Kushnir ---
When I apply the attached patch, I get the following output while reproducing
the bug:
RESULTS: 1 ; kind: OverloadCandidate
kind: 2 chunk text: "Test"
kind: 10 chunk text: "{"
kind: 3 chunk te
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=468605
--- Comment #8 from Igor Kushnir ---
(In reply to Alessandro Carinelli from comment #5)
> I had an idea: after we get trimmedText we move backwards starting from the
> character right before the '.' checking every character until we
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=469079
Igor Kushnir changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||igor...@gmail.com
--- Comment #1 from Igor
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=469180
Igor Kushnir changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
CC
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=460245
--- Comment #4 from Igor Kushnir ---
(In reply to Milian Wolff from comment #3)
> https://discourse.cmake.org/t/feature-request-add-custom-command-all/7609
>
> Let's see what the cmake wizards have to say to this
The propos
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=413372
Igor Kushnir changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||igor...@gmail.com
Status|REPORTED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=463627
--- Comment #3 from Igor Kushnir ---
(In reply to Christopher Yeleighton from comment #2)
> I told KDevelop to close a buffer. KDevelop asked whether to save the
> content. I typed the file name and told KDevelop to save. The buffer
&g
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=469180
Igor Kushnir changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Version Fixed In
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=469739
Igor Kushnir changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||igor...@gmail.com
--- Comment #1 from Igor
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=469739
--- Comment #3 from Igor Kushnir ---
Created attachment 158965
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=158965&action=edit
Compare Configure KDevelop and Configure Kate
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=469739
Igor Kushnir changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REPORTED|CONFIRMED
Ever confirmed|0
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=460025
Igor Kushnir changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||igor...@gmail.com
--- Comment #1 from Igor
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=460025
--- Comment #4 from Igor Kushnir ---
1. Doesn't Ubuntu provide a package with KDev::Tests?
2. Have you tried turning off BUILD_TESTING CMake variable in kdev-css?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=460025
--- Comment #6 from Igor Kushnir ---
According to kdev-css git history, it always unconditionally depended on
KDev::Tests. So either something has changed elsewhere recently, or there is
some issue on your system.
> 1 > kdevelop provides it, but
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=460025
--- Comment #8 from Igor Kushnir ---
I think you are right that something is wrong in kdev-css. See e.g.
https://invent.kde.org/kdevelop/kdev-php/-/blob/master/parser/CMakeLists.txt
Try to enclose the test code in kdev-css/CMakeLists.txt in the `if
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=460025
Igor Kushnir changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REPORTED|RESOLVED
Resolution
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=460245
Bug ID: 460245
Summary: ki18n_install(po) slows down each build, even if
nothing has changed
Classification: Frameworks and Libraries
Product: frameworks-ki18n
Version: 5.98.0
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=460245
--- Comment #2 from Igor Kushnir ---
(In reply to Milian Wolff from comment #1)
> very nasty, I wonder why no-one else complained about this yet :)
Maybe because the po files were committed to the main repositories only about
two weeks ago. And
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=460450
Bug ID: 460450
Summary: KDevelop ignores modifications to CMakeLists.txt
performed while KDevelop's CMake configuring is in
progress
Classification: Applications
Product: kdeve
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=460466
Igor Kushnir changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REPORTED|RESOLVED
Resolution
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=257378
Igor Kushnir changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||d...@hackinger.io
--- Comment #26 from Igor
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=460450
--- Comment #2 from Igor Kushnir ---
(In reply to Milian Wolff from comment #1)
> > The build process is instant and the Build tool view contains the "ninja:
> > no work to do." line.
>
> This comes from CMake and as suc
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=460450
--- Comment #3 from Igor Kushnir ---
(In reply to Igor Kushnir from comment #2)
> and compare *that* to timestamps of cmake source files?
And if KDevelop detects the situation described in this bug, force CMake
reconfiguration.
--
You are receiv
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=460450
--- Comment #5 from Igor Kushnir ---
KDevelop happily runs cmake-configure a second time when the user requests
build, while automatic cmake-configure is running after a change to
CMakeLists.txt. Preventing KDevelop from running multiple cmake
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=417308
Igor Kushnir changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|WAITINGFORINFO |---
Ever confirmed|0
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=417308
Igor Kushnir changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version Fixed In||5.10.221200
Resolution
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=460450
--- Comment #6 from Igor Kushnir ---
Git commit 419d3a5de17134aadbb26edaf7a4b3a369af6567 by Igor Kushnir.
Committed on 22/01/2023 at 16:28.
Pushed by igorkushnir into branch 'master'.
cmake: improve detection of outdated project data
T
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=460450
--- Comment #7 from Igor Kushnir ---
Git commit 11010a3d4d8ddf3a217f686f20248756108fe43e by Igor Kushnir.
Committed on 22/01/2023 at 16:28.
Pushed by igorkushnir into branch 'master'.
cmake: show a warning if project is configured with out
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=464655
Igor Kushnir changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REPORTED|RESOLVED
Resolution
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=464747
Igor Kushnir changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||igor...@gmail.com
--- Comment #1 from Igor
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=464747
--- Comment #3 from Igor Kushnir ---
(In reply to Ian H from comment #2)
> pretty sure I'm using the clang that comes in the snap. does that mean this
> needs to get assigned to the snap team?
I am not sure this is a Clang bug that is fix
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=464747
--- Comment #6 from Igor Kushnir ---
(In reply to Sven Brauch from comment #5)
> The code in question is so trivial that it's very unlikely to be related to
> that code. This snippet occurs in pretty much every C++ file in every
> projec
1 - 100 of 706 matches
Mail list logo
