Re: cmake + segfault

2006-05-18 Thread William A. Hoffman
At 04:26 PM 5/18/2006, Laurent Montel wrote: >Hi, >I use cmake-2.4.1-beta and when I write just: >"cmake -D" I have a "Segmentation fault" > >I don't know where report this bug so I wrote here where there is some cmake >developper. (I didn't test cmake-2.4.2 for the moment) No, this is a bug in c

Re: parallel make again

2006-05-18 Thread Dirk Mueller
On Thursday, 18. May 2006 22:36, Stephan Kulow wrote: > file somewhere below CMakeFiles, but I have no idea how to fix this > correctly. an easy workaround would be to fix dcopidl2cpp to use KSaveFile instead of open+truncate for writing its output. Dirk __

Re: cmake + segfault

2006-05-18 Thread Allen Winter
On Thursday 18 May 2006 16:26, Laurent Montel wrote: > Hi, > I use cmake-2.4.1-beta and when I write just: > "cmake -D" I have a "Segmentation fault" > > I don't know where report this bug so I wrote here where there is some cmake > developper. (I didn't test cmake-2.4.2 for the moment) > Lauren

parallel make again

2006-05-18 Thread Stephan Kulow
Hi! There is a problem with the dependencies of the skel files and I have no idea how to solve this correctly. Try this a couple of times: build/kdebase/apps/konsole/konsole> rm session*; makeobj -j It will sometimes fail like this: Generating session.moc Generating session.moc Generatin

cmake + segfault

2006-05-18 Thread Laurent Montel
Hi, I use cmake-2.4.1-beta and when I write just: "cmake -D" I have a "Segmentation fault" I don't know where report this bug so I wrote here where there is some cmake developper. (I didn't test cmake-2.4.2 for the moment) Regards ___ Kde-buildsystem m

Re: QT_${basename}_LIBRARY

2006-05-18 Thread Thiago Macieira
Alexander Neundorf wrote: >...and under Linux and FreeBSD we don't want to link to the Qt debug > libs, not sure about OS X, also not sure about mingw. >And AFAIK we need a different debug postfix for msvc, but not for the > others. And then it has to be ensured that also the exported > dependencie

Re: QT_${basename}_LIBRARY

2006-05-18 Thread Alexander Neundorf
On Thursday 18 May 2006 17:12, Peter Kümmel wrote: > Alexander Neundorf wrote: > > On Thursday 18 May 2006 15:53, you wrote: > >> Is there any reason why in FindQt4.cmake originally the > >> QT_${basename}_LIBRARY variable is not set with the > >> optimized/debug specifiers, like the > >> QT_${base

QT_${basename}_LIBRARY

2006-05-18 Thread Peter Kümmel
Is there any reason why in FindQt4.cmake originally the QT_${basename}_LIBRARY variable is not set with the optimized/debug specifiers, like the QT_${basename}_LIBRARIES variable? previous FindQt4.cmake: IF (QT_${basename}_LIBRARY_DEBUG AND QT_${basename}_LIBRARY_RELEASE) SET(QT_${basename}_L

Re: kde qt testing

2006-05-18 Thread David Faure
On Thursday 18 May 2006 14:40, Bill Hoffman wrote: > How does KDE test QT GUI applications? We are interested in creating > tests for our new QT based Paraview program www.paraview.org. (the current > one is tcl/tk based, and a QT one is being developed. Are there > tools/approaches for tes

kde qt testing

2006-05-18 Thread Bill Hoffman
How does KDE test QT GUI applications? We are interested in creating tests for our new QT based Paraview program www.paraview.org. (the current one is tcl/tk based, and a QT one is being developed. Are there tools/approaches for testing KDE GUI's?I am talking about playback and record t

Re: C99

2006-05-18 Thread Thiago Macieira
Allen Winter wrote: >A commit to phonon tonight into kdelibs contains a call to expf() which, > according to my reading of the man page, is a C99 function. It has to change. >I was wondering if it makes any sense to add the -std=c++98 option to > the g++ compiler options in CMAKE_CXX_FLAGS > (cm