On Friday, 6. July 2007, Andreas Pakulat wrote:
> Thats not feasible, because some of the sources (though not all) may be
> generated (or may be not generated if the generator is missing) and thus
> I'd have to copy the generation code into each CMakeLists.txt that wants
> to use the sources.
Ehm
On 09.07.07 15:42:08, Dirk Mueller wrote:
> On Friday, 6. July 2007, Andreas Pakulat wrote:
>
> > Thats not feasible, because some of the sources (though not all) may be
> > generated (or may be not generated if the generator is missing) and thus
> > I'd have to copy the generation code into each
On 09.07.07 15:42:08, Dirk Mueller wrote:
> On Friday, 6. July 2007, Andreas Pakulat wrote:
>
> > Thats not feasible, because some of the sources (though not all) may be
> > generated (or may be not generated if the generator is missing) and thus
> > I'd have to copy the generation code into each
On 09.07.07 06:49:23, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> Andreas Pakulat wrote:
> >As I tried to explain at the start: this is specifically about
> >installing module's in different locations.
>
> I think KDEDIRS is the best way.
Ok, tried and it works quite well. now the question is: where to put
this:
e
On 07.07.07 00:51:38, Matthias Kretz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> attached you'll find the next generation of automoc
>
> I replaced kde4automoc.cmake with a C++/QtCore based program that can run
> more
> efficient.
I've got one question: Could it be that a change in any CMakeLists.txt
triggers a full rer
On Monday 09 July 2007, Andreas Pakulat wrote:
> On 07.07.07 00:51:38, Matthias Kretz wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > attached you'll find the next generation of automoc
> >
> > I replaced kde4automoc.cmake with a C++/QtCore based program that can run
> > more efficient.
>
> I've got one question: Could it
On 09.07.07 21:53:48, Matthias Kretz wrote:
> On Monday 09 July 2007, Andreas Pakulat wrote:
> > On 07.07.07 00:51:38, Matthias Kretz wrote:
> > At least thats what I see here at the moment. I
> > changed kdelibs/kate/CMakeLists.txt and now it relinks and regenerates
> > all foo_automoc.cpp.
>
>
On Monday 09 July 2007, Andreas Pakulat wrote:
> On 09.07.07 21:53:48, Matthias Kretz wrote:
> > On Monday 09 July 2007, Andreas Pakulat wrote:
> > > On 07.07.07 00:51:38, Matthias Kretz wrote:
> > > At least thats what I see here at the moment. I
> > > changed kdelibs/kate/CMakeLists.txt and now i
Andreas Pakulat schrieb:
> On 09.07.07 06:49:23, Thiago Macieira wrote:
>
>> Andreas Pakulat wrote:
>>
>>> As I tried to explain at the start: this is specifically about
>>> installing module's in different locations.
>>>
>> I think KDEDIRS is the best way.
>>
>
> Ok, tried and
Hi,
...back from 3-day holiday, noticing a lot has happened on the KDE lists...
On Friday 06 July 2007 18:51, Matthias Kretz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> attached you'll find the next generation of automoc
Patch looks good so far.
> I replaced kde4automoc.cmake with a C++/QtCore based program that can run
On Monday 09 July 2007 17:18, Ralf Habacker wrote:
> Andreas Pakulat schrieb:
> > On 09.07.07 06:49:23, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> >> Andreas Pakulat wrote:
> >>> As I tried to explain at the start: this is specifically about
> >>> installing module's in different locations.
> >>
> >> I think KDEDIRS
Hi,
On Sunday 08 July 2007 14:53, Andreas Pakulat wrote:
> On 08.07.07 20:49:23, Ralf Habacker wrote:
> > Andreas Pakulat schrieb:
> > > On 08.07.07 19:31:49, Andreas Pakulat wrote:
> > >> On 08.07.07 11:06:32, Matt Rogers wrote:
> > >>> On Jul 8, 2007, at 9:35 AM, Andreas Pakulat wrote:
> >
On Monday 09 July 2007 14:22, Andreas Pakulat wrote:
> On 09.07.07 15:42:08, Dirk Mueller wrote:
> > On Friday, 6. July 2007, Andreas Pakulat wrote:
> > > Thats not feasible, because some of the sources (though not all) may be
> > > generated (or may be not generated if the generator is missing) an
On Friday 06 July 2007 13:18, Andras Mantia wrote:
> On Wednesday 04 July 2007, Alexander Neundorf wrote:
> > This is in kdesupport, so it uses FindQt4.cmake coming with cmake,
> > right ? Please replace the FindQt4.cmake from cmake with the one
> > attached here and run cmake again and delete CMak
Alexander Neundorf schrieb:
> On Monday 09 July 2007 17:18, Ralf Habacker wrote:
>
>> Andreas Pakulat schrieb:
>>
>>> On 09.07.07 06:49:23, Thiago Macieira wrote:
>>>
Andreas Pakulat wrote:
> As I tried to explain at the start: this is specifically about
>
15 matches
Mail list logo