Re: [PATCH] builds libs by default with full RPATH

Dirk Mueller wrote: >On Sunday 16 December 2007, Alexander Neundorf wrote: >> Pros: libs should always have the correct RPATH > >why do they need a rpath at all? only because some people have > conflicting libraries installed and forget to set LD_LIBRARY_PATH? Because people don't modify /etc/ld.s

Re: [PATCH] builds libs by default with full RPATH

On Thursday 03 January 2008, Dirk Mueller wrote: > On Sunday 16 December 2007, Alexander Neundorf wrote: > > Pros: libs should always have the correct RPATH > > why do they need a rpath at all? only because some people have conflicting > libraries installed and forget to set LD_LIBRARY_PATH? Becau

Re: [PATCH] builds libs by default with full RPATH

On Sunday 16 December 2007, Alexander Neundorf wrote: > Pros: libs should always have the correct RPATH why do they need a rpath at all? only because some people have conflicting libraries installed and forget to set LD_LIBRARY_PATH? Greetings, Dirk