Re: Reducing excess linkage - cmake 2.6 IMPORTED targets and LINK_INTERFACE_LIBRARIES for kdelibs

2008-06-29 Thread Modestas Vainius
Hello, Ok, my comments about your reduced_linking_2.patch can be found below: > khtml > LINK_INTERFACE_LIBRARIES "kparts;kjs;kio;kdeui;kdecore" Please drop kjs. It is definitely excess here because none of our target_link_libraries fixes has ever included it. > krosscore > LINK_INTERFACE_LIBRAR

Re: Reducing excess linkage - cmake 2.6 IMPORTED targets and LINK_INTERFACE_LIBRARIES for kdelibs

2008-06-29 Thread Alexander Neundorf
On Sunday 29 June 2008, Modestas Vainius wrote: > Hello, > > Ok, my comments about your reduced_linking_2.patch can be found below: Thanks for reviewing :-) > > khtml > > LINK_INTERFACE_LIBRARIES "kparts;kjs;kio;kdeui;kdecore" > > Please drop kjs. It is definitely excess here because none of our

Re: Reducing excess linkage - cmake 2.6 IMPORTED targets and LINK_INTERFACE_LIBRARIES for kdelibs

2008-06-29 Thread Thiago Macieira
Alexander Neundorf wrote: >> The only QtXml user is kross/core/action.h >> fromDomElement/toDomElement. I don't think this is enough to link all >> krosscore users against QtXml. > >Hmm, is it a real problem if QtXml is listed here ? It shouldn't add > more package dependencies (QtXml should be ins

Re: Reducing excess linkage - cmake 2.6 IMPORTED targets and LINK_INTERFACE_LIBRARIES for kdelibs

2008-06-29 Thread Alexander Neundorf
On Monday 30 June 2008, you wrote: > Alexander Neundorf wrote: > >> The only QtXml user is kross/core/action.h > >> fromDomElement/toDomElement. I don't think this is enough to link all > >> krosscore users against QtXml. > > > >Hmm, is it a real problem if QtXml is listed here ? It shouldn't add >