Re: [CMake] CMake 2.8.0 RC 1 ready for testing!

2009-09-29 Thread Michael Pyne
On Tuesday 29 September 2009 16:05:38 Matt Williams wrote: > 2009/9/29 Alexander Neundorf : > > On Tuesday 29 September 2009, Pau Garcia i Quiles wrote: > >> On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 8:16 PM, Alexander Neundorf > >> > >> wrote: > >> > I guess we will with it, because I don't really see a difference

Re: [CMake] CMake 2.8.0 RC 1 ready for testing!

2009-09-29 Thread Andreas Pakulat
On 29.09.09 21:20:02, Pau Garcia i Quiles wrote: > On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 8:16 PM, Alexander Neundorf > wrote: > > > I guess we will with it, because I don't really see a difference between > > source compatibility for C++ files and for CMake files. In both cases, if > > it's broken, the package

Re: [CMake] CMake 2.8.0 RC 1 ready for testing!

2009-09-29 Thread Matt Williams
2009/9/29 Alexander Neundorf : > On Tuesday 29 September 2009, Pau Garcia i Quiles wrote: >> On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 8:16 PM, Alexander Neundorf >> >> wrote: >> > I guess we will with it, because I don't really see a difference between >> > source compatibility for C++ files and for CMake files. I

Re: [CMake] CMake 2.8.0 RC 1 ready for testing!

2009-09-29 Thread Alexander Neundorf
On Tuesday 29 September 2009, Pau Garcia i Quiles wrote: > On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 8:16 PM, Alexander Neundorf > > wrote: > > I guess we will with it, because I don't really see a difference between > > source compatibility for C++ files and for CMake files. In both cases, if > > it's broken, the

Re: [CMake] CMake 2.8.0 RC 1 ready for testing!

2009-09-29 Thread Pau Garcia i Quiles
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 8:16 PM, Alexander Neundorf wrote: > I guess we will with it, because I don't really see a difference between > source compatibility for C++ files and for CMake files. In both cases, if > it's broken, the package will not compile. Do we promise source compatibility for C+

Re: [CMake] CMake 2.8.0 RC 1 ready for testing!

2009-09-29 Thread Alexander Neundorf
On Tuesday 29 September 2009, Andreas Pakulat wrote: > On 29.09.09 19:24:54, Alexander Neundorf wrote: ... > > Doesn't that imply that we will always need the 2.4.x behaviour for all > > of KDE 4.x ? > > I mean, if I set some property to NEW, which may change some behaviour, > > the developer may h

Re: [CMake] CMake 2.8.0 RC 1 ready for testing!

2009-09-29 Thread Andreas Pakulat
On 29.09.09 19:24:54, Alexander Neundorf wrote: > On Tuesday 29 September 2009, Bill Hoffman wrote: > > David Cole wrote: > > > Thanks for the info, I'll fix the project later. I believe however > > > that I > > > didn't see any warnings, which should now be posted if I understood > > >

Re: [CMake] CMake 2.8.0 RC 1 ready for testing!

2009-09-29 Thread Alexander Neundorf
On Tuesday 29 September 2009, Bill Hoffman wrote: > David Cole wrote: > > Thanks for the info, I'll fix the project later. I believe however > > that I > > didn't see any warnings, which should now be posted if I understood > > correctly? Or is that part of the OLD behaviour still w

Re: Is there a hook in cmake to test-compile things after an installation?

2009-09-29 Thread Alexander Neundorf
On Tuesday 29 September 2009, Friedrich W. H. Kossebau wrote: > Hi, > > to ensure that example code showing how to use a library is up-to-date > (and/or the installed headers/libs are okay) I would like to have that code > automatically test-compiled directly after an installation of the > headers/

Re: [CMake] CMake 2.8.0 RC 1 ready for testing!

2009-09-29 Thread Helio Chissini de Castro
Em Segunda-feira 28 de setembro 2009, às 05:12:15, você escreveu: > On 28.09.09 00:05:35, Pau Garcia i Quiles wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 10:07 PM, Bill Hoffman wrote: > > > I am happy to announce that CMake 2.8.0 has entered the beta stage! You > > > can find the source and binaries here:

Re: [CMake] CMake 2.8.0 RC 1 ready for testing!

2009-09-29 Thread Andreas Pakulat
On 29.09.09 09:26:30, Andreas Pakulat wrote: > On 28.09.09 16:08:22, Brad King wrote: > > Andreas Pakulat wrote: > > > On 25.09.09 16:07:21, Bill Hoffman wrote: > > >> I am happy to announce that CMake 2.8.0 has entered the beta stage! You > > >> can find the source and binaries here: http://www.cm

Re: [CMake] CMake 2.8.0 RC 1 ready for testing!

2009-09-29 Thread Bill Hoffman
David Cole wrote: > Thanks for the info, I'll fix the project later. I believe however > that I > didn't see any warnings, which should now be posted if I understood > correctly? Or is that part of the OLD behaviour still working? > > > If you set the policty to OLD, you should j

Re: [CMake] CMake 2.8.0 RC 1 ready for testing!

2009-09-29 Thread David Cole
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 3:26 AM, Andreas Pakulat wrote: > On 28.09.09 16:08:22, Brad King wrote: > > Andreas Pakulat wrote: > > > On 25.09.09 16:07:21, Bill Hoffman wrote: > > >> I am happy to announce that CMake 2.8.0 has entered the beta stage! > You > > >> can find the source and binaries here

Re: [CMake] CMake 2.8.0 RC 1 ready for testing!

2009-09-29 Thread Andreas Pakulat
On 28.09.09 16:08:22, Brad King wrote: > Andreas Pakulat wrote: > > On 25.09.09 16:07:21, Bill Hoffman wrote: > >> I am happy to announce that CMake 2.8.0 has entered the beta stage! You > >> can find the source and binaries here: http://www.cmake.org/files/v2.8/. > >> > >> I am sure I am leaving s