> - find_library(Soprano) -> macro_optional_find_library(Soprano)
errata: s/find_libary/find_package/g - you get the drill
___
Kde-buildsystem mailing list
Kde-buildsystem@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-buildsystem
Hi
Looking at current state of requirements regarding Nepomuk libs in KDE
SC (trunk), apart from kdebase/runtime/nepomuk obviously, only
kdepim/akonadiconsole seems to have hard dependency on Nepomuk
libraries. Dependency which cannot be made optional easily as it's
been put in .ui file - browserw
On Monday 21 December 2009, Alexander Neundorf wrote:
> > devel/kde/share/apps/cmake/modules/KDELibs4LibraryTargets-debugfull.cmake
> >:2 09 (SET_TARGET_PROPERTIES):
>
> Do you still have that file ?
> I'd be interested in it.
The commit that fixed the problem seems to be:
SVN commit 1064652 by
On Monday 21 December 2009, Sebastian Trueg wrote:
> Alexander Neundorf wrote:
> > On Sunday 20 December 2009, Maciej Mrozowski wrote:
> >> On Sunday 20 of December 2009 22:55:05 Maciej Mrozowski wrote:
> >>> I'll take a look at kdepim other KDE SC modules in trunk and see
> >>> whether there any s
Alexander Neundorf wrote:
> On Sunday 20 December 2009, Maciej Mrozowski wrote:
>> On Sunday 20 of December 2009 22:55:05 Maciej Mrozowski wrote:
>>> I'll take a look at kdepim other KDE SC modules in trunk and see whether
>>> there any spurious Soprano/SDO cmake checks.
>> - The only easy and s
On Monday 21 December 2009, Jens-Michael Hoffmann wrote:
> On Sunday, 20. December 2009 17:23:35 Alexander Neundorf wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > our FindQt4.cmake in kdelibs/cmake/modules/ is now basically synced with
> > the version from current cmake.
> > The big change today was to merge the way how
On Sunday 20 December 2009, Maciej Mrozowski wrote:
> On Sunday 20 of December 2009 22:55:05 Maciej Mrozowski wrote:
> > I'll take a look at kdepim other KDE SC modules in trunk and see whether
> > there any spurious Soprano/SDO cmake checks.
>
> - The only easy and safe pick is kdebase/runtime.
>
On Monday 21 December 2009, ctrlaltca wrote:
> Hi, I'm a developer of KVIrc, a project that uses kde as an optional
> component.
> A fedora packager reported us a problem compiling kvirc with cmake 2.8
> (https://svn.kvirc.de/kvirc/ticket/655); after a lot of investigation,
> we found out that the
On Monday 21 December 2009, Anne-Marie Mahfouf wrote:
> Yes it's all broken now since your commit yesterday Alexander, please fix
> it pretty quick as reverting makes all kdelibs to be rebuilt!
so is it working again ?
I didn't see a problem related to this on the dashboard for kdepimlibs, kdepim
On Monday 21 December 2009 11:40:18 Anne-Marie Mahfouf wrote:
> Yes it's all broken now since your commit yesterday Alexander, please fix
> it pretty quick as reverting makes all kdelibs to be rebuilt!
>
> Anne-Marie
>
I just rebuilt kdelibs and this seems to be fixed
> On Monday 21 December 2
The runtime patch looks good to me.
As for the SDO_MIN_VERSION: that would probably be more convenient, yes.
Maciej Mrozowski wrote:
> On Sunday 20 of December 2009 22:55:05 Maciej Mrozowski wrote:
>
>> I'll take a look at kdepim other KDE SC modules in trunk and see whether
>> there any spuriou
On Monday, 21. December 2009 08:58:20 Jens-Michael Hoffmann wrote:
> On Sunday, 20. December 2009 17:23:35 Alexander Neundorf wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > our FindQt4.cmake in kdelibs/cmake/modules/ is now basically synced with
> > the version from current cmake.
> > The big change today was to merge th
Hi, I'm a developer of KVIrc, a project that uses kde as an optional
component.
A fedora packager reported us a problem compiling kvirc with cmake 2.8
(https://svn.kvirc.de/kvirc/ticket/655); after a lot of investigation,
we found out that the problem was cmake being fooled in using both kde's
and
Yes it's all broken now since your commit yesterday Alexander, please fix it
pretty quick as reverting makes all kdelibs to be rebuilt!
Anne-Marie
On Monday 21 December 2009 08:58:20 Jens-Michael Hoffmann wrote:
> On Sunday, 20. December 2009 17:23:35 Alexander Neundorf wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > o
14 matches
Mail list logo