---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/105126/
---
(Updated March 12, 2013, 7:22 p.m.)
Status
--
This change has been di
> On March 11, 2013, 5:19 a.m., Andrea Scarpino wrote:
> > "I was quite clear: "qmake" must point by default to Qt 4 if Qt 4 present."
> > While qtchooser sounds like a great solution to handle this, it only adds
> > more confusion from a packager view: we cannot have N differents
> > configura
> On March 11, 2013, 6:19 a.m., Andrea Scarpino wrote:
> > "I was quite clear: "qmake" must point by default to Qt 4 if Qt 4 present."
> > While qtchooser sounds like a great solution to handle this, it only adds
> > more confusion from a packager view: we cannot have N differents
> > configura
> On March 11, 2013, 6:19 a.m., Andrea Scarpino wrote:
> > "I was quite clear: "qmake" must point by default to Qt 4 if Qt 4 present."
> > While qtchooser sounds like a great solution to handle this, it only adds
> > more confusion from a packager view: we cannot have N differents
> > configura
> On March 11, 2013, 6:19 a.m., Andrea Scarpino wrote:
> > "I was quite clear: "qmake" must point by default to Qt 4 if Qt 4 present."
> > While qtchooser sounds like a great solution to handle this, it only adds
> > more confusion from a packager view: we cannot have N differents
> > configura
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/109404/#review28931
---
"I was quite clear: "qmake" must point by default to Qt 4 if Qt
