That wasn't very constructive/positive...
On Monday 08 June 2015 15:22:20 Ben Cooksley wrote:
> The Qt developers
> didn't want to provide any infrastructure at all to make developer
> environments (including our CI system) easier.
The *any* here is too broad. One approach was rejected, there ar
On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 7:13 PM, David Faure wrote:
> That wasn't very constructive/positive...
Sorry, i've spent way too much time fighting with the Qt folks on this one.
>
> On Monday 08 June 2015 15:22:20 Ben Cooksley wrote:
>> The Qt developers
>> didn't want to provide any infrastructure at
On Sunday 07 June 2015 23:40:30 René J.V. Bertin wrote:
> On Sunday June 07 2015 22:20:49 Alex Merry wrote:
> > I'm not sure that's possible, at least not in a way that doesn't risk
> > breaking more than it fixes.
>
> Well, as I hinted at earlier, one possibility would be to link in an
> addition
