On Tuesday 27 April 2010, Alexander Neundorf wrote:
> On Tuesday 27 April 2010, Kevin Ottens wrote:
> > On Monday 12 April 2010 18:51:41 Alexander Neundorf wrote:
> > > On Monday 12 April 2010, Kevin Ottens wrote:
> > > > On Saturday 10 April 2010 19:34:14 Alexander Neundorf wrote:
> > > > > Doesn'
On Wednesday 28 April 2010 21:37:02 Alexander Neundorf wrote:
> On Wednesday 28 April 2010, Kevin Ottens wrote:
> > On Tuesday 27 April 2010 22:02:33 Alexander Neundorf wrote:
> > 3) The platform profile definition has to be processed as early as
> > possible (in particular before the add_subdirect
On Wednesday 28 April 2010, Kevin Ottens wrote:
> On Tuesday 27 April 2010 22:02:33 Alexander Neundorf wrote:
> > kdelibs_cmake_profiles.patch:
> > Looks good, but I would put the information not in a separate
> > KDEPlatformProfile.cmake file, but just in the already existing
> > KDELibsDependenci
On Wednesday 28 April 2010, Marco Martin wrote:
> On 4/27/10, Ian Lawrence wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > > kdelibs_cmake_profiles.patch:
> >
> > It might be worth mentioning the effect that this patch could have on
> > downstream. Three build runs, tripling the build time. I am
> > uncomfortable with
On Tuesday 27 April 2010 22:02:33 Alexander Neundorf wrote:
> kdelibs_cmake_profiles.patch:
> Looks good, but I would put the information not in a separate
> KDEPlatformProfile.cmake file, but just in the already existing
> KDELibsDependencies.cmake file.
>
> (if you have a look at that file you'l
On Tuesday 27 April 2010, Kevin Ottens wrote:
> On Monday 12 April 2010 18:51:41 Alexander Neundorf wrote:
> > On Monday 12 April 2010, Kevin Ottens wrote:
> > > On Saturday 10 April 2010 19:34:14 Alexander Neundorf wrote:
> > > > Doesn't look too bad, but I wouldn't commit it before there is
> > >
On Monday 12 April 2010 18:51:41 Alexander Neundorf wrote:
> On Monday 12 April 2010, Kevin Ottens wrote:
> > On Saturday 10 April 2010 19:34:14 Alexander Neundorf wrote:
> > > Doesn't look too bad, but I wouldn't commit it before there is
> > > something which also uses this.
> >
> > Well, it's c
On Thursday 15 April 2010, Kevin Ottens wrote:
> On Monday 12 April 2010 18:51:41 Alexander Neundorf wrote:
> > How about putting it in together with the first use of it ?
>
> OK, fair enough. We'll probably make a separate commit for it though.
>
> > I'd also wait for a conclusion of the discussio
On Monday 12 April 2010 18:51:41 Alexander Neundorf wrote:
> How about putting it in together with the first use of it ?
OK, fair enough. We'll probably make a separate commit for it though.
> I'd also wait for a conclusion of the discussion on k-c-d.
Of course. Although I'd say it's reaching it
On Saturday 10 April 2010 19:34:14 Alexander Neundorf wrote:
> Doesn't look too bad, but I wouldn't commit it before there is something
> which also uses this.
Well, it's chicken and egg problem. We kind need it in order to start the
efforts of cutting deps and so on which will use the content of
On Monday 12 April 2010, Kevin Ottens wrote:
> On Saturday 10 April 2010 19:34:14 Alexander Neundorf wrote:
> > Doesn't look too bad, but I wouldn't commit it before there is something
> > which also uses this.
>
> Well, it's chicken and egg problem. We kind need it in order to start the
> efforts
11 matches
Mail list logo
