Hi,
Whats the reasoning behind using -O2 in the Debug CXX flags? A debug
build shouldn't use _any_ optimizations IMHO.
And the _DEBUGFULL versions are meaningless as there's no such buildtype
(at least with cmake 2.6).
Andreas
--
You have many friends and very few living enemies.
_
On Friday 18 July 2008, Andreas Pakulat wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Whats the reasoning behind using -O2 in the Debug CXX flags? A debug
> build shouldn't use _any_ optimizations IMHO.
I think there were lengthy discussion about the flags for the different build
types. I guess this was the result.
/me hasn'
Alexander Neundorf wrote:
>On Friday 18 July 2008, Andreas Pakulat wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Whats the reasoning behind using -O2 in the Debug CXX flags? A debug
>> build shouldn't use _any_ optimizations IMHO.
>
>I think there were lengthy discussion about the flags for the different
> build types. I gu
On Friday 18 July 2008, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> Alexander Neundorf wrote:
> >On Friday 18 July 2008, Andreas Pakulat wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> Whats the reasoning behind using -O2 in the Debug CXX flags? A debug
> >> build shouldn't use _any_ optimizations IMHO.
> >
> >I think there were lengthy d
On 18.07.08 17:55:50, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> Alexander Neundorf wrote:
> >On Friday 18 July 2008, Andreas Pakulat wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> Whats the reasoning behind using -O2 in the Debug CXX flags? A debug
> >> build shouldn't use _any_ optimizations IMHO.
> >
> >I think there were lengthy dis
Andreas Pakulat wrote:
>Damn, actually I have a slight feeling I've asked this already. Any
>objections against putting this information close to the gcc-version of
>setting the flags. So neither I nor anybody else need to ask stupid
>questions again?
>Ok, I guess that means I can add "debugfull"
On 18.07.08 23:06:50, Alexander Neundorf wrote:
> On Friday 18 July 2008, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> > Alexander Neundorf wrote:
> > >On Friday 18 July 2008, Andreas Pakulat wrote:
> > >> Hi,
> > >>
> > >> Whats the reasoning behind using -O2 in the Debug CXX flags? A debug
> > >> build shouldn't use
On Saturday 19 July 2008, Andreas Pakulat wrote:
> Please can you have a look at the attached patch and let
> me know wether thats ok with you.
Looks good to me, except that you're removing a find_library call for kjsapi,
unrelated to what you wanted to do.
--
David Faure, [EMAIL PROTECTED], sp
On Saturday 19 July 2008, Andreas Pakulat wrote:
...
> and more importantly make Debugfull work with CMake 2.6. As I didn't
> find a reference of CMAKE_CONFIGURATION_TYPES for cmake 2.4 I've set it
> only for 2.6. Please can you have a look at the attached patch and let
> me know wether thats ok wi
On 19.07.08 10:28:41, Alexander Neundorf wrote:
> On Saturday 19 July 2008, Andreas Pakulat wrote:
> ...
> > and more importantly make Debugfull work with CMake 2.6. As I didn't
> > find a reference of CMAKE_CONFIGURATION_TYPES for cmake 2.4 I've set it
> > only for 2.6. Please can you have a look
On Saturday 19 July 2008, Andreas Pakulat wrote:
> On 19.07.08 10:28:41, Alexander Neundorf wrote:
> > On Saturday 19 July 2008, Andreas Pakulat wrote:
> > ...
> >
> > > and more importantly make Debugfull work with CMake 2.6. As I didn't
> > > find a reference of CMAKE_CONFIGURATION_TYPES for cmak
On 18.07.08 18:26:58, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> Andreas Pakulat wrote:
> >Damn, actually I have a slight feeling I've asked this already. Any
> >objections against putting this information close to the gcc-version of
> >setting the flags. So neither I nor anybody else need to ask stupid
> >questions
On Saturday 19 July 2008, Andreas Pakulat wrote:
> On 19.07.08 10:28:41, Alexander Neundorf wrote:
> > On Saturday 19 July 2008, Andreas Pakulat wrote:
> > ...
> >
> > > and more importantly make Debugfull work with CMake 2.6. As I didn't
> > > find a reference of CMAKE_CONFIGURATION_TYPES for cmak
On 05.08.08 02:02:21, Alexander Neundorf wrote:
> On Saturday 19 July 2008, Andreas Pakulat wrote:
> > On 19.07.08 10:28:41, Alexander Neundorf wrote:
> > > On Saturday 19 July 2008, Andreas Pakulat wrote:
> > > ...
> > >
> > > > and more importantly make Debugfull work with CMake 2.6. As I didn't
On Saturday 19 July 2008, Andreas Pakulat wrote:
> On 18.07.08 23:06:50, Alexander Neundorf wrote:
> > On Friday 18 July 2008, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> > > Alexander Neundorf wrote:
> > > >On Friday 18 July 2008, Andreas Pakulat wrote:
> > > >> Hi,
> > > >>
> > > >> Whats the reasoning behind using
On 06.11.08 00:34:08, Alexander Neundorf wrote:
> On Saturday 19 July 2008, Andreas Pakulat wrote:
> > On 18.07.08 23:06:50, Alexander Neundorf wrote:
> > > Thanks for the explanation :-)
> > > Can you put that on techbase, somewhere related to cmake/building ?
> >
> > I'm putting it on techbase in
16 matches
Mail list logo