On Thursday 17 April 2008, Matthias Kretz wrote:
> On Wednesday 16 April 2008, Alexander Neundorf wrote:
> > On Wednesday 16 April 2008, Matthias Kretz wrote:
> > > On Wednesday 16 April 2008, Alexander Neundorf wrote:
> > > > On Wednesday 16 April 2008, Andreas Pakulat wrote:
> > > > > On 15.04.08
On Thursday 17 April 2008, Matthias Kretz wrote:
> run kde4automoc unconditionally for all targets
With a patch to kde4automoc.cpp it's not too bad. Please try the attached
patch. And if you think this is the way to go then let me know how to
unconditionally run automoc without that touch hack.
On Wednesday 16 April 2008, Alexander Neundorf wrote:
> On Wednesday 16 April 2008, Matthias Kretz wrote:
> > On Wednesday 16 April 2008, Alexander Neundorf wrote:
> > > On Wednesday 16 April 2008, Andreas Pakulat wrote:
> > > > On 15.04.08 19:19:45, Alexander Neundorf wrote:
> > > > > On Monday 14
On Wednesday 16 April 2008, Matthias Kretz wrote:
> On Wednesday 16 April 2008, Alexander Neundorf wrote:
> > On Wednesday 16 April 2008, Andreas Pakulat wrote:
> > > On 15.04.08 19:19:45, Alexander Neundorf wrote:
> > > > On Monday 14 April 2008, Andreas Pakulat wrote:
> > > > > Hi,
> > > > >
> >
On Wednesday 16 April 2008, Alexander Neundorf wrote:
> On Wednesday 16 April 2008, Andreas Pakulat wrote:
> > On 15.04.08 19:19:45, Alexander Neundorf wrote:
> > > On Monday 14 April 2008, Andreas Pakulat wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > so today I found that there are actually problems with cma
On Wednesday 16 April 2008, Andreas Pakulat wrote:
> On 15.04.08 19:19:45, Alexander Neundorf wrote:
> > On Monday 14 April 2008, Andreas Pakulat wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > so today I found that there are actually problems with cmake 2.6 and
> > > dependency scanning.
> > >
> > > a) after changin
On 15.04.08 19:19:45, Alexander Neundorf wrote:
> On Monday 14 April 2008, Andreas Pakulat wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > so today I found that there are actually problems with cmake 2.6 and
> > dependency scanning.
> >
> > a) after changing an installed header the .moc files for headers that
> > include t
On Monday 14 April 2008, Andreas Pakulat wrote:
> Hi,
>
> so today I found that there are actually problems with cmake 2.6 and
> dependency scanning.
>
> a) after changing an installed header the .moc files for headers that
> include the updated header are not re-generated which might cause
> probl
Hi,
so today I found that there are actually problems with cmake 2.6 and
dependency scanning.
a) after changing an installed header the .moc files for headers that
include the updated header are not re-generated which might cause
problems when you do ABI changes (like removing a method) on the
in
