Em Terça-feira 26 Janeiro 2010, às 14:34:43, Stephan Kulow escreveu:
> Am Dienstag 26 Januar 2010 schrieb David Faure:
> > I often heard complaints that icecream is also launching too many "ld"
> > jobs on the local machine at the same time; shouldn't icecream serialize
> > that too, already, given
Am Dienstag 26 Januar 2010 schrieb David Faure:
>
> I often heard complaints that icecream is also launching too many "ld"
> jobs on the local machine at the same time; shouldn't icecream serialize
> that too, already, given that this -does- go through icecream already?
> I'm a bit confused as to
On Monday 11 January 2010, Lubos Lunak wrote:
> On Monday 11 of January 2010, Alexander Neundorf wrote:
> > On Friday 08 January 2010, Lubos Lunak wrote:
> > > On Thursday 07 of January 2010, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
> > > > a more generic solution would be recognizing a KDE4_TOOL_WRAPPER
> > > >
Em Segunda-feira 11. Janeiro 2010, às 22.03.44, Alexander Neundorf escreveu:
> On Monday 11 January 2010, Lubos Lunak wrote:
> > somebody has already reported them various cmake's shortcomings in
> > dealing with parallel make when compared to unsermake.
>
> Please do :-)
What is needed is for ma
On Monday 11 January 2010, Lubos Lunak wrote:
> On Monday 11 of January 2010, Alexander Neundorf wrote:
> > On Friday 08 January 2010, Lubos Lunak wrote:
> > > On Thursday 07 of January 2010, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
> > > > a more generic solution would be recognizing a KDE4_TOOL_WRAPPER
> > > >
On Monday 11 of January 2010, Alexander Neundorf wrote:
> On Friday 08 January 2010, Lubos Lunak wrote:
> > On Thursday 07 of January 2010, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
> > > a more generic solution would be recognizing a KDE4_TOOL_WRAPPER cmake
> > > variable and prepending it to all non-c-compiler e
On Friday 08 January 2010, Lubos Lunak wrote:
> On Thursday 07 of January 2010, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 07, 2010 at 04:20:39PM +0100, Lubos Lunak wrote:
> > > I would like to commit the attached kdelibs/icecream patches, in order
> > > to avoid running into pathetic OOM situation
On Sun, Jan 10, 2010 at 10:01:48AM +0100, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> How about my "better" option? That works fine for everyone, for all
> programs, regardless of buildfarm?
>
yes, i'd vote for polishing it up (making the variables generic),
hosting it somewhere (qt labs?) and adding a respective hi
Em Sábado 9. Janeiro 2010, às 23.46.42, Michael Pyne escreveu:
> On Saturday 09 January 2010 12:58:35 Lubos Lunak wrote:
> > On Friday 08 of January 2010, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
> > > this sounds like a nice thing to fix then. ;)
> >
> > Gee, I don't need it to be perfect, all I want is paralle
On Saturday 09 January 2010 12:58:35 Lubos Lunak wrote:
> On Friday 08 of January 2010, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
> > this sounds like a nice thing to fix then. ;)
>
> Gee, I don't need it to be perfect, all I want is parallel make not to
> bring the machine down to its knees. If my improvement
On Friday 08 of January 2010, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 08, 2010 at 04:09:27PM +0100, Lubos Lunak wrote:
> > On Thursday 07 of January 2010, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
> > > for one, covering just meinproc is a bit shortsighted (i bet a few
> > > webkit links can blow your box just as
Em Sexta-feira 08 Janeiro 2010, às 16:09:27, Lubos Lunak escreveu:
> Ok, but I'd prefer a more long-term solution, when I finally got to doing
> something about it.
A more long-term solution would be for cmake to understand the concept of
compile farms.
In any case, I have solved this problem
On Fri, Jan 08, 2010 at 04:09:27PM +0100, Lubos Lunak wrote:
> On Thursday 07 of January 2010, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
> > for one, covering just meinproc is a bit shortsighted (i bet a few
> > webkit links can blow your box just as nicely :D).
>
> They can't, because I don't run into 20 webkit
On Thursday 07 of January 2010, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 07, 2010 at 04:20:39PM +0100, Lubos Lunak wrote:
> > I would like to commit the attached kdelibs/icecream patches, in order
> > to avoid running into pathetic OOM situations on Linux.
>
> i'll comment on the icecream patch whe
On Thu, Jan 07, 2010 at 04:20:39PM +0100, Lubos Lunak wrote:
> I would like to commit the attached kdelibs/icecream patches, in order to
> avoid running into pathetic OOM situations on Linux.
>
i'll comment on the icecream patch when i find the time. ping me on irc
if i don't.
but i find the kd
On Thursday 07 of January 2010, Allan Sandfeld Jensen wrote:
> Hi Lubak
>
> This is an excelent idea (I've tried convincing Dirk to do something
> similar for years).
>
> But why are you detecting icecream and adding in cmake? Wouldn't it be
> better to simple add a meinproc link during icecream in
Hi Lubak
This is an excelent idea (I've tried convincing Dirk to do something similar
for years).
But why are you detecting icecream and adding in cmake? Wouldn't it be better
to simple add a meinproc link during icecream installation like it is done for
cc and c++?
Regards
`Allan
__
Hello,
I would like to commit the attached kdelibs/icecream patches, in order to
avoid running into pathetic OOM situations on Linux.
In short, run (or rather don't) 'make -j30' e.g. in kdebase/runtime/doc. As
we have a nice icecream build farm here, I normally do such parallel builds,
and
18 matches
Mail list logo
