small cmake benchmark

2006-04-05 Thread Dirk Mueller
Hi, I fixed the unsermake errors in kdelibs locally and ran unsermake --compile-jobs=500 / make -j500 with cmake (over a big icecream cluster). Enjoy. unsermake: real32m55.389s user15m29.590s sys 9m20.351s cmake: real7m48.456s user5m31.316s sys 3m3.135s -- Di

Re: small cmake benchmark

2006-04-05 Thread Matt Rogers
On Wednesday 05 April 2006 17:59, Dirk Mueller wrote: > Hi, > > I fixed the unsermake errors in kdelibs locally and ran > unsermake --compile-jobs=500 / make -j500 with cmake (over a big icecream > cluster). Enjoy. > > unsermake: > > real32m55.389s > user15m29.590s > sys 9m20.351s > > >

Re: small cmake benchmark

2006-04-06 Thread Thiago Macieira
Dirk Mueller wrote: >unsermake: > >real    32m55.389s >user    15m29.590s >sys     9m20.351s > > >cmake: > >real    7m48.456s >user    5m31.316s >sys     3m3.135s Wow. That's a huge improvement. Let me guess: libtool? My own comparison (11min vs 22min on a 25-node cluster) shows similar perform

Re: small cmake benchmark

2006-04-06 Thread Dirk Mueller
On Thu, Apr 06, 2006 at 01:31:03AM +0200, Thiago Macieira wrote: > Wow. That's a huge improvement. > Let me guess: libtool? I believe the biggest improvement is that we have a lot less DSO's to link: all the libtool convenience libraries are gone, and those prevented a parallelisation. So far,

Re: small cmake benchmark

2006-04-06 Thread Alexander Neundorf
On Thursday 06 April 2006 16:15, Dirk Mueller wrote: > On Thu, Apr 06, 2006 at 01:31:03AM +0200, Thiago Macieira wrote: > > Wow. That's a huge improvement. > > Let me guess: libtool? > > I believe the biggest improvement is that we have a lot less DSO's to link: > all the libtool convenience librar