On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 08:34:51PM +0100, Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> Do you guys think that it would make sense to explicitely suggest that
> applications use the "GPL version 2 or version 3 or later versions approved
> by
> the membership of KDE e.V. " variant unless they really have special ne
On Saturday 15. February 2014 15.30.54 Àlex Fiestas wrote:
> On Friday 14 February 2014 22:52:04 Jeff Mitchell wrote:
> > This email serves two purposes: one, to inform the community of the
> > direction we would like to go with KDE's Git hosting and request
> > feedback; two, to ask for volunteer
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 1:45 PM, Frederik Gladhorn wrote:
>
>
> I tried working with github for a project, using a workflow of reviewing
> each commit. I personally really disliked it for creating a merge commit
> for each commit, that just clutters up the history (try looking at any
> github pro
On 17 Feb 2014, at 9:14, Paul Gideon Dann wrote:
On Monday 17 Feb 2014 08:03:24 Alexander Dymo wrote:
That said, last time I tried it was a resource consumer monster,
has that
been fixed? Is it going to scale KDE size?
It's a Rails app. Those tend to use more resources. But deploying
with
On 17 Feb 2014, at 7:46, Sebastian Kügler wrote:
On Friday, February 14, 2014 13:00:57 Jeff Mitchell wrote:
I thought this was a really nice letter that was sent to us, so I'm
passing it on to the community. I did already get in touch with him
about the 4.0 release, but I'm happy to forward alo
On 18 Feb 2014, at 11:15, Jeff Mitchell wrote:
On 17 Feb 2014, at 7:46, Sebastian Kügler wrote:
On Friday, February 14, 2014 13:00:57 Jeff Mitchell wrote:
I thought this was a really nice letter that was sent to us, so I'm
passing it on to the community. I did already get in touch with him
ab
On 18 Feb 2014, at 8:02, Martin Klapetek wrote:
Fwiw, the Review Board guys are working on a push-based review system,
bascially a gerrit with RB interface. This is a set of extension
scripts
usable with RB 2.0, which brings many other features as well, you can
watch
a video of it here: http://
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 5:19 PM, Jeff Mitchell wrote:
> On 18 Feb 2014, at 8:02, Martin Klapetek wrote:
>
>> Fwiw, the Review Board guys are working on a push-based review system,
>> bascially a gerrit with RB interface. This is a set of extension scripts
>> usable with RB 2.0, which brings many
On 18 Feb 2014, at 11:22, Martin Klapetek wrote:
Generally speaking, Gerrit needs to "own" repositories. Would this
require
some sort of thing like RB hosting the Git repos?
Sort of, it would need its own clone of the repos, which is moreless
the
case right now anyway right? But I imagine i
On 18 Feb 2014, at 7:45, Frederik Gladhorn wrote:
I tried working with github for a project, using a workflow of
reviewing each commit.
I personally really disliked it for creating a merge commit for each
commit, that just
clutters up the history (try looking at any github project with a few
co
On Tuesday, February 18, 2014 11:15:55 Jeff Mitchell wrote:
> On 17 Feb 2014, at 7:46, Sebastian Kügler wrote:
> > On Friday, February 14, 2014 13:00:57 Jeff Mitchell wrote:
> >> I thought this was a really nice letter that was sent to us, so I'm
> >> passing it on to the community. I did already g
As my questionnaire [1] is now open for two weeks I plan to give it another 24
hours and then close it. So you’ve still time till tomorrow, Wednesday,
February 19, 23.59 UTC to fill in the survey and participate in the draw.
If you should need more time or planned to fill in the questionnaire [1
Le 16/02/2014 17:40, Kevin Ottens a écrit :
Since a project going through the incubator should have a sponsor who oversees
the integration and provide guidance to a community willing to join, let me
say that I volunteer to be GCompris' sponsor.
Hi,
Kevin, I am please to have you guiding the GCo
On Sunday 16 February 2014 22:10:38 Ben Cooksley wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 16, 2014 at 3:30 AM, Àlex Fiestas wrote:
> > On Friday 14 February 2014 22:52:04 Jeff Mitchell wrote:
> >> This email serves two purposes: one, to inform the community of the
> >> direction we would like to go with KDE's Git hos
14 matches
Mail list logo
