Boudewijn Rempt ha scritto:
I guess we should also be really careful, as you said some software is
"done"
and the fact that it didn't get any development doesn't mean it should be
killed.
Of course. But kmail (not kmail2) is _dead_. It's bugs should be closed.
I would ask Laurent first. He sa
Myriam Schweingruber ha scritto:
Last time I was trying to close the kmail 1 bugs as unmaintained, asking
people to reopen if it stilkl applies to kmail2 I was shouted at and
told that somebody has to check if that still applies to Kmail2 before
closing, go figure! I just fear that with 880 open
