Re: [kde-community] KDE Mission - let's do this!

2016-04-29 Thread Thomas Pfeiffer
On Freitag, 29. April 2016 14:32:33 CEST Olivier Churlaud wrote: > > As Aleix said, what do you mean exactly with that ? > > I could interpret it as > > - sources are available > > - it is easy to build > > - it's highly configurable > > - data is stored in easily accessible formats (text, or docu

Re: [kde-community] KDE Mission - let's do this!

2016-04-29 Thread Thomas Pfeiffer
On Donnerstag, 28. April 2016 22:43:02 CEST Alexander Neundorf wrote: > > Does the order of the sections imply priorities ? > E.g. "tinkering" comes before "presence on all device classes" ? Not really, I just put them in the order they came to my mind. If you think a different order makes more

Re: [kde-community] KDE Mission - let's do this!

2016-04-29 Thread Thomas Pfeiffer
On Donnerstag, 28. April 2016 23:07:45 CEST Alexander Neundorf wrote: > On Thursday, April 28, 2016 22:32:21 Thomas Pfeiffer wrote: > > On Donnerstag, 28. April 2016 18:23:51 CEST Aleix Pol wrote: > ... > > > > Is offering integration of proprietary services needed to be > > > mentioned? It's a st

Re: [kde-community] KDE Mission - let's do this!

2016-04-29 Thread Olivier Churlaud
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2016 22:43:02 +0200 From: Alexander Neundorf To: informing about and discussing non-technical community topics Subject: Re: [kde-community] KDE Mission - let's do this! Message-ID:<2628160.naub4nz...@tuxedo.neundorf.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Hi