On Friday, 25 August 2017 10:11:09 CEST Boudewijn Rempt wrote:
> On Sun, 13 Aug 2017, Volker Krause wrote:
> > # Telemetry Policy Draft
>
> Do we already have a wiki page I can link to? I want to publish
> Alexey's experimental build today, and that needs to be announced
> pretty carefully.
Yep:
On Mon, Aug 21, 2017 at 5:50 AM, Eike Hein wrote:
>
> Hi!
Hi Eike,
>
> I decided to start a new thread because no one reads monster threads :)
>
> Things to talk about:
>
> (1) QtWS KDE team
>
> Currently I have gotten responses from:
> * Eike (yes I talk to myself)
> * Helio
> * Rohan
> * Adria
On Freitag, 25. August 2017 12:46:16 CEST Kenny Duffus wrote:
> On Friday, 18 August 2017 01:11:39 BST Thomas Pfeiffer wrote:
> > Hi everyone,
> > I've finally managed to enter all of our proposed requirements for a
> > KDE-wide primary IM/chat solution into a tool for creating Kano
> > surveys:
>
El dijous, 24 d’agost de 2017, a les 21:07:49 CEST, Ben Cooksley va escriure:
> Hi all,
>
> The following is Sysadmin's suggested plan for the retirement of
> Reviewboard now that Phabricator is fully up and running for hosting
> of code reviews.
>
> Phase 1: Commences September 2: All repositori
On 25/08/2017 5:41 AM, "Albert Astals Cid" wrote:
El dijous, 24 d’agost de 2017, a les 21:07:49 CEST, Ben Cooksley va
escriure:
> Hi all,
>
> The following is Sysadmin's suggested plan for the retirement of
> Reviewboard now that Phabricator is fully up and running for hosting
> of code reviews.
On Friday August 25 2017 07:33:43 Ben Cooksley wrote:
Hi,
>> Note that due to how Reviewboard stores diffs and reproduces them for
>> use, some reviews may have decayed and may no longer be readable. This
>> is due to short-hashes which are used by Git/Reviewboard in diffs now
>> having collision
On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 8:20 PM, René J.V. Bertin wrote:
> On Friday August 25 2017 07:33:43 Ben Cooksley wrote:
>
> Hi,
Hi Rene,
>
>>> Note that due to how Reviewboard stores diffs and reproduces them for
>>> use, some reviews may have decayed and may no longer be readable. This
>>> is due to s