On miércoles, 5 de septiembre de 2018 20:34:35 (CEST) Kenny Duffus wrote:
> Hi
>
> The Akademy 2018 videos are now available
>
> The simplest way to access them is by browsing the talks schedule, choosing
> a talk you are interested in and view its details, you can then click Video
> in the
Does anyone else have comments on status names? The name itself or yay/nay on
renames?
Here are some updated proposed names based on feedback and thesaurus searching:
UNCONFIRMED -> REPORTED or OPEN
WONTFIX -> ASDESIGNED or INTENTIONAL
INVALID -> NOTABUG or ERRONEOUS
Andrew Crouthamel
‐‐‐
Great work! Just another minor issue: student presentation video is in place of
the "Bringing Community Data Analysis Back to KDE" one and vice versa.
On September 5, 2018 9:48:46 PM GMT+03:00, Nate Graham wrote:
>Thanks for this, Kenny. However I don't see the video for my talk:
>Konquering
Thanks for this, Kenny. However I don't see the video for my talk: Konquering
the world, https://conf.kde.org/en/Akademy2018/public/events/50. The "Video"
link on that page is broken.
Nate
On Wed, 05 Sep 2018 11:34:35 -0700 Kenny Duffus wrote
> Hi
>
> The Akademy 2018
Hi
The Akademy 2018 videos are now available
The simplest way to access them is by browsing the talks schedule, choosing a
talk you are interested in and view its details, you can then click Video in
the links section
https://conf.kde.org/en/Akademy2018/public/schedule/1
Alternatively you
Am Mittwoch, 5. September 2018, 11:36:45 CEST schrieb Martin Steigerwald:
> Isn´t there RESOLVED / UNMAINTAINED, when product is no longer
> supported?
It has, leaves us with the other cases.
Christian
On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 11:15 AM Nate Graham wrote:
>
> Hello sysadmin!
Hi Nate,
>
> In https://phabricator.kde.org/T6832, we seemed to reach general
> agreement that products closed to new bugs shouldn't appear on the
> Browse page in bugzilla (https://bugs.kde.org/describecomponents.cgi).
> Is
Sorry, I don't have better suggestions. Naming things is a hard problem
in bug science.
Ilmari
Andrew Crouthamel kirjoitti 5.9.2018 klo 11.17:
I like REPORTED as well. That leaves timeframe out of the status name.
Bugs can stay REPORTED but never CONFIRMED, and that all makes sense.
Based
Christian Loosli - 05.09.18, 10:36:
> > WONTFIX -> ASDESIGNED
> > INVALID -> NOTABUG
>
> which make it, in my opinion, less clear.
>
> WONTFIX is not only used when something is "as per design", but also
> in cases such as product no longer supported, a third party thing
> used (e.g. an
Am Mittwoch, 5. September 2018, 04:28:05 CEST schrieb Andrew Crouthamel:
> Hello,
Hi,
thanks for your work and looking at this, I agree with them except
> WONTFIX -> ASDESIGNED
> INVALID -> NOTABUG
which make it, in my opinion, less clear.
WONTFIX is not only used when something is "as per
I like REPORTED as well. That leaves timeframe out of the status name. Bugs can
stay REPORTED but never CONFIRMED, and that all makes sense.
Based on David's feedback, this would work for his needs I believe.
As for WONTFIX vs. ASDESIGNED, Ilmari, do you have any suggestions for
alternatives?
On onsdag 5. september 2018 04.28.05 CEST Andrew Crouthamel wrote:
> Hello,
>
> As part of the "Streamlined onboarding of new contributors" goal from 2017
> (https://phabricator.kde.org/T7116), Nate, myself, Julian, and others have
> been working on ways to clean up Bugzilla, as well as the bug
I'm fine with this as well.
On woensdag 5 september 2018 04:28:05 CEST Andrew Crouthamel wrote:
> Hello,
>
> As part of the "Streamlined onboarding of new contributors" goal from 2017
> (https://phabricator.kde.org/T7116), Nate, myself, Julian, and others have
> been working on ways to clean up
13 matches
Mail list logo
