Re: Closing NEEDSINFO bugs after 30 days

2018-11-16 Thread Harald Sitter
On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 2:40 PM Alexander Potashev wrote: > > пт, 16 нояб. 2018 г. в 16:35, Boudewijn Rempt : > > > > On vrijdag 16 november 2018 14:31:39 CET Alexander Potashev wrote: > > > > > You only considered to case when human sets NEEDSINFO. If NEEDSINFO is > > > set by a script, we may ha

Re: Closing NEEDSINFO bugs after 30 days

2018-11-16 Thread Alexander Potashev
пт, 16 нояб. 2018 г. в 16:35, Boudewijn Rempt : > > On vrijdag 16 november 2018 14:31:39 CET Alexander Potashev wrote: > > > You only considered to case when human sets NEEDSINFO. If NEEDSINFO is > > set by a script, we may have the same problem, would you suggest > > implementing the same behaviou

Re: Closing NEEDSINFO bugs after 30 days

2018-11-16 Thread Christoph Feck
On 16.11.2018 14:31, Alexander Potashev wrote: You only considered to case when human sets NEEDSINFO. If NEEDSINFO is set by a script, we may have the same problem, would you suggest implementing the same behaviour? How would a script know what information is needed to further investigate an i

Re: Closing NEEDSINFO bugs after 30 days

2018-11-16 Thread Boudewijn Rempt
On vrijdag 16 november 2018 14:31:39 CET Alexander Potashev wrote: > You only considered to case when human sets NEEDSINFO. If NEEDSINFO is > set by a script, we may have the same problem, would you suggest > implementing the same behaviour? We don't have the script setting NEEDSINFO, do we? At

Re: Closing NEEDSINFO bugs after 30 days

2018-11-16 Thread Alexander Potashev
пт, 16 нояб. 2018 г. в 16:22, Harald Sitter : > > On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 2:16 PM Boudewijn Rempt wrote: > > > > On vrijdag 16 november 2018 14:11:29 CET Harald Sitter wrote: > > > > > - human sets needsinfo > > > - 15 days pass: bot posts reminder > > > - reporter comments > > > - N days pass: bu

Re: Closing NEEDSINFO bugs after 30 days

2018-11-16 Thread Harald Sitter
On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 2:16 PM Boudewijn Rempt wrote: > > On vrijdag 16 november 2018 14:11:29 CET Harald Sitter wrote: > > > - human sets needsinfo > > - 15 days pass: bot posts reminder > > - reporter comments > > - N days pass: bug gets automatically dropped back to whatever the > > previous s

Re: Closing NEEDSINFO bugs after 30 days

2018-11-16 Thread Boudewijn Rempt
On vrijdag 16 november 2018 14:11:29 CET Harald Sitter wrote: > - human sets needsinfo > - 15 days pass: bot posts reminder > - reporter comments > - N days pass: bug gets automatically dropped back to whatever the > previous state was? Yes, that would be perfect! As far as I'm concerned, N can b

Re: Policy on stale bugs (was Re: Closing NEEDSINFO bugs after 30 days)

2018-11-16 Thread Andrew Crouthamel
The changes you see were due to me. The Status change was a convenience to me for follow up, but as noted, has caused alarm. My apologies for that. I am already in process of sending updates and resetting the status, but am doing so in blocks to not spam anyone. Give it a few days and all will b

Re: Closing NEEDSINFO bugs after 30 days

2018-11-16 Thread Harald Sitter
(Pulling this back to the NEEDSINFO thread since it sounds unrelated to what Luigi was writing about in the Policy on stale bugs thread) On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 12:51 PM Boudewijn Rempt wrote: > I know it's well-meant, and it does help to get old bugs resolved -- but it > really should use a scri

Re: Policy on stale bugs (was Re: Closing NEEDSINFO bugs after 30 days)

2018-11-16 Thread Harald Sitter
On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 10:37 AM Luigi Toscano wrote: > Please disable it for now, or just enable it for projects who explicitly wants > it for now. As mentioned on IRC: everyone please note that unless a change was made by bug-jani...@kde.org it was not actually done automatically (or not that I

Re: Policy on stale bugs (was Re: Closing NEEDSINFO bugs after 30 days)

2018-11-16 Thread Christoph Feck
On 16.11.2018 12:50, Boudewijn Rempt wrote: -- and worse, it makes me hesitate to put bugs in the NEEDINFO state. Worse. Bugs that never have been in NEEDSINFO seem to automatically get this state after some time of inactivity now.

Re: Policy on stale bugs (was Re: Closing NEEDSINFO bugs after 30 days)

2018-11-16 Thread Boudewijn Rempt
On vrijdag 16 november 2018 10:37:08 CET Luigi Toscano wrote: > the (semi)automated process which pings and then closes NEEDINFO bugs was > implemented, but I've noticed another policy which was never discussed (as > far as I know) here: bugs opened for a while > > I disagree with this policy, an

Re: Policy on stale bugs (was Re: Closing NEEDSINFO bugs after 30 days)

2018-11-16 Thread Luigi Toscano
Luigi Toscano ha scritto: Andrew Crouthamel ha scritto: I've been spending a lot of time browsing, searching, and filtering our bugs in Bugzilla. One of the areas I've found that could use improvement, are the NEEDSINFO bugs. Often, bugs are placed into this status, either awaiting additional

Re: Policy on stale bugs (was Re: Closing NEEDSINFO bugs after 30 days)

2018-11-16 Thread Jaroslaw Staniek
On Fri, 16 Nov 2018 at 10:37, Luigi Toscano wrote: > Andrew Crouthamel ha scritto: > > I've been spending a lot of time browsing, searching, and filtering our > bugs > > in Bugzilla. One of the areas I've found that could use improvement, are > the > > NEEDSINFO bugs. Often, bugs are placed into

Policy on stale bugs (was Re: Closing NEEDSINFO bugs after 30 days)

2018-11-16 Thread Luigi Toscano
Andrew Crouthamel ha scritto: I've been spending a lot of time browsing, searching, and filtering our bugs in Bugzilla. One of the areas I've found that could use improvement, are the NEEDSINFO bugs. Often, bugs are placed into this status, either awaiting additional information or backtraces,