Re: [announcement] Telegram bridging to be retired Wed. 20 Sept. | 5 to-dos

2023-08-23 Thread Niccolò Ve
On Wed, Aug 23, 2023, 6:01 PM Ingo Klöcker wrote: > On Mittwoch, 23. August 2023 17:16:16 CEST Niccolò Ve wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 23, 2023, 5:04 PM Ingo Klöcker wrote: > > > On Mittwoch, 23. August 2023 16:55:25 CEST Niccolò Ve wrote: > > > > > Postponing the d

Re: [announcement] Telegram bridging to be retired Wed. 20 Sept. | 5 to-dos

2023-08-23 Thread Niccolò Ve
On Wed, Aug 23, 2023, 5:04 PM Ingo Klöcker wrote: > On Mittwoch, 23. August 2023 16:55:25 CEST Niccolò Ve wrote: > > > Postponing the deadline is not ideal, since there always will be people > > > jumping out saying "Why wasn't I told" "Was i

Re: [announcement] Telegram bridging to be retired Wed. 20 Sept. | 5 to-dos

2023-08-23 Thread Niccolò Ve
> Postponing the deadline is not ideal, since there always will be people > jumping out saying "Why wasn't I told" "Was it discussed before" again > and again. Please note that the community was never told about this decision before yesterday, and it was never discussed publicly. On Wed, Aug 23,

Re: [announcement] Telegram bridging to be retired Wed. 20 Sept. | 5 to-dos

2023-08-23 Thread Niccolò Ve
> 3rd party > social network platforms need moderators/user support. And Promo time. A LOT of promo time. Maintaing 3rd party social network platforms is much, much, much more time expensive compared to maintaining the bridge. On Wed, Aug 23, 2023, 2:05 PM Ilmari Lauhakangas < ilmari.lauhakan...

Re: [announcement] Telegram bridging to be retired Wed. 20 Sept. | 5 to-dos

2023-08-23 Thread Niccolò Ve
Just to confirm: this means that if we find a more reliable way to bridge the channels we can avoid this? If so, I'd be happy to give it a shot. ~Nicco Il giorno mer 23 ago 2023 alle ore 10:27 Ingo Klöcker ha scritto: > On Mittwoch, 23. August 2023 09:34:04 CEST Tomaz Canabrava wrote: > > (On t

Re: [announcement] Telegram bridging to be retired Wed. 20 Sept. | 5 to-dos

2023-08-22 Thread Niccolò Ve
This is a terribly careless decision, for multiple reasons. Firstly, this is something that has a strong impact on the entire community and, because of that, it should've been discussed publicly before agreeing on this. I had been told this was going to happen, but only through private messages an

Re: On the reappointment of Richard Stallman as a director of the FSF

2021-04-01 Thread Niccolò Ve
They Il giorno gio 1 apr 2021 alle ore 12:45 Ingo Klöcker ha scritto: > On Donnerstag, 1. April 2021 00:27:57 CEST Albert Astals Cid wrote: > > I feel that making a distinction between "KDE e.V. Board of Directors" > and > > "KDE e.V." is artificial, the board of directors have been democratical

Re: Apology

2021-03-26 Thread Niccolò Ve
Hi. > Posts about Richard Stallman are off-topic and will not be allowed. This is... plain out wrong. Off topic means off topic. A RMS reply to a thread about RMS is NOT off topic. If you want to shutdown the discussion, just say so. The fact that RMS is not "the issue" (he's surely _an_ issue...

Re: RMS and open letter

2021-03-24 Thread Niccolò Ve
In answer to ren...@kde.org: > It is quite clear that we are very far from a consensus on this > question. So please, don't try to push KDE as an organization to sign > such a letter. Each people can choose to sign it under its own name or not. Three or four people against a proposal hardly count