Thank you very much to everyone who gave your support or critique of the
idea of archiving and retiring the Dot.
From the replies, it appears there are several community members who
either support the idea or are neutral about it, and one or two who are
opposed to it. See the previous replies
On Tuesday, 3 October 2023 23:04:12 CEST Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> El dimarts, 3 d’octubre de 2023, a les 22:01:26 (CEST), Paul Brown va
>
> escriure:
> > On Tuesday, 3 October 2023 20:30:51 CEST Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> > > El dimarts, 3 d’octubre de 2023, a les 19:18:37 (CEST), Paul Brown va
El dimarts, 3 d’octubre de 2023, a les 22:01:26 (CEST), Paul Brown va
escriure:
> On Tuesday, 3 October 2023 20:30:51 CEST Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> > El dimarts, 3 d’octubre de 2023, a les 19:18:37 (CEST), Paul Brown va
> >
> > escriure:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > > That is not correct, Akademy
On Tuesday, 3 October 2023 20:30:51 CEST Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> El dimarts, 3 d’octubre de 2023, a les 19:18:37 (CEST), Paul Brown va
>
> escriure:
> > Hello,
> >
> > > That is not correct, Akademy makes a huge use of the dot for sharing
> > > info
> > > to the wider community
> > >
> > >
El dimarts, 3 d’octubre de 2023, a les 19:18:37 (CEST), Paul Brown va
escriure:
> Hello,
>
> > That is not correct, Akademy makes a huge use of the dot for sharing info
> > to the wider community
> >
> > You can see this by looking at the articles on https://dot.kde.org/
>
> But that reasoning
Hello,
> That is not correct, Akademy makes a huge use of the dot for sharing info to
> the wider community
>
> You can see this by looking at the articles on https://dot.kde.org/
But that reasoning is a bit weird, no? I am reading "There are many Akademy
articles on the dot because Akademy
On Dienstag, 3. Oktober 2023 08:53:24 CEST Sune Vuorela wrote:
> On 2023-10-02, Joseph P. De Veaugh-Geiss wrote:
> > In this context, a radical idea came up: perhaps we can archive and
> > retire the Dot altogether.
>
> I'd like to come up with an alternative proposal:
>
> Make the dot more
On 2023-10-02, Joseph P. De Veaugh-Geiss wrote:
> In this context, a radical idea came up: perhaps we can archive and
> retire the Dot altogether.
I'd like to come up with an alternative proposal:
Make the dot more used:
- Make it easier to submit articles there
- Retire all project blogs in
Le lun. 2 oct. 2023 à 16:54, Joseph P. De Veaugh-Geiss
a écrit :
>
> Thank you for your input, Carl! Just saw your replies after hitting send.
>
> On 10/2/23 16:42, Carl Schwan wrote:
> > On Monday, 2 October 2023 14:05:25 CEST Johnny Jazeix wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> >> The GSoC/SoK
I'm not against retiring it. It used to be cool and must-read and we had
several articles a week but once social media came along and comments
became more spam filled it stopped being so interesting and it's now a
shadow of its former self.
I think it just needs identified what uses still exist
Thank you for your input, Carl! Just saw your replies after hitting send.
On 10/2/23 16:42, Carl Schwan wrote:
On Monday, 2 October 2023 14:05:25 CEST Johnny Jazeix wrote:
Hi,
Hi,
The GSoC/SoK management team publishes blog posts on the Dot. Is there
an alternative where we can post?
On Monday, 2 October 2023 14:05:25 CEST Johnny Jazeix wrote:
> Hi,
Hi,
> The GSoC/SoK management team publishes blog posts on the Dot. Is there
> an alternative where we can post?
This is a good question :) season.kde.org would be the first candidate that
comes to my mind but considering that
12 matches
Mail list logo
