Mission has been accepted

2017-08-19 Thread Lydia Pintscher
Hey everyone :) Given that there were no further comments I have now removed the draft tag from the Mission at https://community.kde.org/KDE/Mission. Thank you everyone for your comments and the fruitful discussion. I am grateful for your input and help in getting this written down. I hope next to

Re: Mission has been accepted

2017-08-19 Thread Valorie Zimmerman
On Sat, Aug 19, 2017 at 12:58 PM, Lydia Pintscher wrote: > Hey everyone :) > > Given that there were no further comments I have now removed the draft > tag from the Mission at https://community.kde.org/KDE/Mission. > Thank you everyone for your comments and the fruitful discussion. I am > grateful

Re: Mission has been accepted

2017-08-20 Thread Olivier Churlaud
Hi, > Date: Sat, 19 Aug 2017 13:13:56 -0700 > From: Valorie Zimmerman > To: informing about and discussing non-technical community topics > > Subject: Re: Mission has been accepted > Message-ID: > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" >

Re: Mission has been accepted

2017-08-21 Thread Sebastian Kügler
On zaterdag 19 augustus 2017 21:58:26 CEST Lydia Pintscher wrote: > Given that there were no further comments I have now removed the draft > tag from the Mission at https://community.kde.org/KDE/Mission. > Thank you everyone for your comments and the fruitful discussion. I am > grateful for your in

Re: Mission has been accepted

2017-08-21 Thread Sebastian Kügler
On maandag 21 augustus 2017 10:48:06 CEST Sebastian Kügler wrote: > On zaterdag 19 augustus 2017 21:58:26 CEST Lydia Pintscher wrote: > > > > Given that there were no further comments I have now removed the draft > > tag from the Mission at https://community.kde.org/KDE/Mission. > > Thank you eve

Re: Mission has been accepted

2017-08-21 Thread Lydia Pintscher
On Mon, Aug 21, 2017 at 11:42 AM, Sebastian Kügler wrote: > On maandag 21 augustus 2017 10:48:06 CEST Sebastian Kügler wrote: >> What's a bit unclear to me: Is the strategy as we put it into the wiki also >> considered "Accepted"? To me, it is, with a big *but*: While it is too >> vague, we need t