Re: Issues with Solid from trunk and qtcreator 2.0.1...

On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 3:41 AM, Thiago Macieira wrote: > On Wednesday, 10 de November de 2010 09:32:48 Dawit A wrote: >> sigh I got everthing crossed up! Indeed since this is the system bus >> a sendmsg here is response back to the client. For some reason this >> response does not seem to make it

Re: User bus conclusion

On Wednesday, 10 de November de 2010 21:21:12 Alexander Neundorf wrote: > > Peak performance at 0.44 ms at roundtrip. Throughput increases with > > amount of data transferred per call. > > > > If you're making anywhere near 100 calls per second, you're doing > > something wrong. > > 6 MB/s for lo

Re: Fwd: User bus conclusion

On Wednesday, 10 de November de 2010 22:42:53 Ingo Klöcker wrote: > On Wednesday 10 November 2010, Thiago Macieira wrote: > > Em Quarta-feira, 10 de Novembro de 2010, às 17:13:20, David Faure > > escreveu: > > > Yes for daemons a user bus sounds good. But not for anything with a > > > GUI - e.g. y

Re: Fwd: User bus conclusion

On Wednesday 10 November 2010, Ingo Klöcker wrote: > On Wednesday 10 November 2010, Thiago Macieira wrote: > > Em Quarta-feira, 10 de Novembro de 2010, às 18:01:18, Andras Mantia > > escreveu: > > > On Wednesday 10 November 2010, Thiago Macieira wrote: > > > > On Wednesday, 10 de November de 2010

Re: Fwd: User bus conclusion

On Wednesday 10 November 2010, Thiago Macieira wrote: > Em Quarta-feira, 10 de Novembro de 2010, às 18:01:18, Andras Mantia escreveu: > > On Wednesday 10 November 2010, Thiago Macieira wrote: > > > On Wednesday, 10 de November de 2010 06:24:46 Andras Mantia wrote: > > > > On Wednesday 10 November

Re: Fwd: User bus conclusion

On Wednesday 10 November 2010, Thiago Macieira wrote: > Em Quarta-feira, 10 de Novembro de 2010, às 17:13:20, David Faure escreveu: > > Yes for daemons a user bus sounds good. But not for anything with a > > GUI - e.g. you wouldn't be able to run any kuniqueapplication > > twice (once on each disp

Re: User bus conclusion

On Wednesday 10 November 2010, you wrote: > Em Quarta-feira, 10 de Novembro de 2010, às 18:14:31, Alexander Neundorf > > escreveu: > > I'm not sure it reaches the "fast" part of this goal... > > QDEBUG : tst_QDBusPerformance::oneWay(normal:256-byteArray) 249344 bytes in > 500 ms (in 974 calls): 0.4

Re: User bus conclusion

> > D-Bus is not meant for network transparency. It's not part of its goals, so > no > one has tried to do it properly. > > You may want to drop D-Bus altoghether and use OMQ in instead, if you need the network. Bèrto

Review Request: Handle QTreeView row expanding and collapsing in KWidgetItemDelegate

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://svn.reviewboard.kde.org/r/5826/ --- Review request for kdelibs. Summary --- Currently one has to resize the

Re: Review Request: Add isInUse() method to StorageDrive interface

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://svn.reviewboard.kde.org/r/5770/#review8636 --- Ship it! - Will On 2010-11-10 14:57:02, Jacopo De Simoi wrote:

Re: User bus conclusion

Em Quarta-feira, 10 de Novembro de 2010, às 18:14:31, Alexander Neundorf escreveu: > I'm not sure it reaches the "fast" part of this goal... QDEBUG : tst_QDBusPerformance::oneWay(normal:256-byteArray) 249344 bytes in 500 ms (in 974 calls): 0.475586 MB/s QDEBUG : tst_QDBusPerformance::oneWay(nor

Re: Fwd: User bus conclusion

Em Quarta-feira, 10 de Novembro de 2010, às 18:01:18, Andras Mantia escreveu: > On Wednesday 10 November 2010, Thiago Macieira wrote: > > On Wednesday, 10 de November de 2010 06:24:46 Andras Mantia wrote: > > > On Wednesday 10 November 2010, Thiago Macieira wrote: > > > > So I have to ask again: do

Re: Fwd: User bus conclusion

Em Quarta-feira, 10 de Novembro de 2010, às 17:13:20, David Faure escreveu: > Yes for daemons a user bus sounds good. But not for anything with a GUI - > e.g. you wouldn't be able to run any kuniqueapplication twice (once on > each display), since the bus would tell it "you're already running". Th

Re: User bus conclusion

On Wednesday 10 November 2010, Thiago Macieira wrote: > Em Quarta-feira 10 Novembro 2010, às 10:37:57, Mark Kretschmann escreveu: > > On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 12:29 AM, Thiago Macieira wrote: > > > D-Bus community is proposing to do away with the session bus and > > > replace it with a user bus. Lo

Re: Fwd: User bus conclusion

On Wednesday 10 November 2010, Kevin Krammer wrote: > On Wednesday, 2010-11-10, Chani wrote: > > > > Actually, with the Akonadi based kmail, it no longer needs to be a > > > > singleton and in fact isn't anymore, afaik. There is a per user > > > > Akonadi server, and you can connect to it from as m

Re: Chinese Lunar Calendar Support in Kdelibs

On Wednesday 10 November 2010 05:36:45 F H wrote: > Hi all, > > It has been quite a few years since Liang Qi tried to add Chinese lunar > calendar support in the kdelibs ( see > http://lists.kde.org/?t=11981797634 ) . > > Recently, I tried some effort to patch my local kdelibs (4.5.1) to get

Re: Review Request: Add isInUse() method to StorageDrive interface

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://svn.reviewboard.kde.org/r/5770/ --- (Updated 2010-11-10 14:57:02.366292) Review request for kdelibs, Will Stephe

Re: Fwd: User bus conclusion

Em Quarta-feira, 10 de Novembro de 2010, às 14:56:23, Daniele E. Domenichelli escreveu: > On 11/10/2010 12:29 AM, Thiago Macieira wrote: > > So I have to ask again: do we allow or support multiple logins of the > > same user, on the same machine (same $HOME)? > > Does it affect logins on multiple

Re: Fwd: Using multiple klocales uses stale translations

Op den Dingsdag 09 November 2010 Klock 22:32:52 hett John Layt schreven: > But I can't see any reason why it shouldn't lowercase any given value, I'll > fix that and update the apidox to state it should be lowercase. Why not give the full truth and document that uppercase values are accepted and

Re: Fwd: User bus conclusion

On 11/10/2010 12:29 AM, Thiago Macieira wrote: > So I have to ask again: do we allow or support multiple logins of the same > user, on the same machine (same $HOME)? Does it affect logins on multiple machines sharing the same $HOME (for example using nfs?) I'd rather have an unique user bus AND

Re: why kdelibs?

On Wednesday 10 November 2010 14:04:56 Stephen Kelly wrote: > Alexander Neundorf wrote: > > I mean, with a set of libs with dependencies cut down as is the case for > > Tablet or even more the Mobile profile, doesn't that go a long way to > > making the libraries easier usable by other projects ? >

Re: why kdelibs?

Alexander Neundorf wrote: > On Saturday 30 October 2010, Stephen Kelly wrote: >> Replying to John and Kevin here. >> >> John Layt wrote: >> > Some excellent points, and it makes clear the sort of areas we need to >> > be >> > working on. Currently choosing to use kdelibs or any other KDE library

Re: User bus conclusion

Em Quarta-feira 10 Novembro 2010, às 10:37:57, Mark Kretschmann escreveu: > On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 12:29 AM, Thiago Macieira wrote: > > D-Bus community is proposing to do away with the session bus and replace > > it with a user bus. Long story short, this means that multiple logins of > > the sam

Re: Fwd: User bus conclusion

On Wednesday, 2010-11-10, Till Adam wrote: > On Wednesday 10 November 2010 00:46:08 David Faure wrote: > > On Wednesday 10 November 2010, Thiago Macieira wrote: > > > So I have to ask again: do we allow or support multiple logins of the > > > same user, on the same machine (same $HOME)? > > > > Bu

Re: Review Request: Social About Dialog implementation for KDElibs

> On 2010-11-09 21:40:54, David Faure wrote: > > trunk/KDE/kdelibs/kdeui/dialogs/kaboutapplicationpersonlistdelegate_p.cpp, > > line 45 > > > > > > Why is this a pointer to a QSize, rather than just a QSize member? >

Re: Fwd: User bus conclusion

On Wednesday 10 November 2010 00:46:08 David Faure wrote: > On Wednesday 10 November 2010, Thiago Macieira wrote: > > So I have to ask again: do we allow or support multiple logins of the > > same user, on the same machine (same $HOME)? > But yeah, using kmail from two logins at the same time woul

Re: User bus conclusion

On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 12:29 AM, Thiago Macieira wrote: > D-Bus community is proposing to do away with the session bus and replace it > with a user bus. Long story short, this means that multiple logins of the same > user are not allowed by construction. What I would really like, and please excu

Re: Fwd: User bus conclusion

On Wednesday, 2010-11-10, Chani wrote: > > > Actually, with the Akonadi based kmail, it no longer needs to be a > > > singleton and in fact isn't anymore, afaik. There is a per user Akonadi > > > server, and you can connect to it from as many clients, graphical or > > > otherwise, as you wish. > >

Re: Issues with Solid from trunk and qtcreator 2.0.1...

On Wednesday, 10 de November de 2010 09:32:48 Dawit A wrote: > sigh I got everthing crossed up! Indeed since this is the system bus > a sendmsg here is response back to the client. For some reason this > response does not seem to make it to the client or at least cause the > client to react until 2

Re: Issues with Solid from trunk and qtcreator 2.0.1...

On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 3:14 AM, Thiago Macieira wrote: > On Wednesday, 10 de November de 2010 09:04:02 Dawit A wrote: >> I cannot figure out when the reply was sent back because there is a >> lot of chatter on the system dbus, but I definitely see the pause >> after the following message was sent

Re: Fwd: User bus conclusion

On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 09:10:48AM +0100, Thiago Macieira wrote: > For example: KConfig has lock files so saving one file won't step on > another instance's toes. However, does it really work? If the contents > of the config file are read into memory and saved from memory, what > happens to changes

Re: Fwd: User bus conclusion

On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 08:45:36AM +0100, Thiago Macieira wrote: > After this change: it's the same session, so it will reuse the running > kdeinit4, klauncher, kded4, etc. If you try to use kwallet, the > password dialog will show in the older session. > well, it doesn't have to be that way - the

Re: Issues with Solid from trunk and qtcreator 2.0.1...

On Wednesday, 10 de November de 2010 09:04:02 Dawit A wrote: > I cannot figure out when the reply was sent back because there is a > lot of chatter on the system dbus, but I definitely see the pause > after the following message was sent > > 1289374216.174405 sendmsg(23, {msg_name(0)=NULL, > msg_i

Re: Fwd: User bus conclusion

On Wednesday, 10 de November de 2010 06:24:46 Andras Mantia wrote: > On Wednesday 10 November 2010, Thiago Macieira wrote: > > So I have to ask again: do we allow or support multiple logins of the > > same user, on the same machine (same $HOME)? > > Uh, I hope they won't do it. I use *a lot* mult

Re: Issues with Solid from trunk and qtcreator 2.0.1...

Well On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 6:09 PM, Thiago Macieira wrote: > On Saturday, 6 de November de 2010 13:58:33 Dawit A wrote: >> Hmm... if the call times out though, why doesn't it return an error ? >> I get back the expected reply for the introspection call instead... > > Can you check with strace on