---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/101365/
---
Review request for KDE Runtime.
Summary
---
The attached patch fixes
On Sunday, May 15, 2011 02:03:32 Stefan Majewsky wrote:
> On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 10:18 PM, Parker Coates
>
> wrote:
> > Also note that KPixmapCache is now deprecated and that KImageCache is
> > just a thin convenience wrapper around KSharedDataCache. So really,
> > KSharedDataCache is KDE's only
On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 10:18 PM, Parker Coates
wrote:
> Also note that KPixmapCache is now deprecated and that KImageCache is
> just a thin convenience wrapper around KSharedDataCache. So really,
> KSharedDataCache is KDE's only current caching system.
Michael Pyne, if you're reading this, pleas
On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 15:51, Christoph Feck wrote:
> On Saturday 14 May 2011 21:42:18 Mark wrote:
>> Why is KDE having it's own image/pixmap caching classes
>> when the Qt lib also has them (QPixmapCache and QCache).
>
> KDE's cache classes are on-disk caches and cross-application, while Qt's cac
On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 9:51 PM, Christoph Feck wrote:
> On Saturday 14 May 2011 21:42:18 Mark wrote:
> > Why is KDE having it's own image/pixmap caching classes
> > when the Qt lib also has them (QPixmapCache and QCache).
>
> KDE's cache classes are on-disk caches and cross-application, while Qt
On Saturday 14 May 2011 21:42:18 Mark wrote:
> Why is KDE having it's own image/pixmap caching classes
> when the Qt lib also has them (QPixmapCache and QCache).
KDE's cache classes are on-disk caches and cross-application, while Qt's cache
classes are only in-memory and not shared between applic
Hi,
I noticed this because of https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/101347/ and it
made me wonder.. Why is KDE having it's own image/pixmap caching classes
when the Qt lib also has them (QPixmapCache and QCache).
The only thing you would "miss" is caching QImage.
Anyway, now that the Qt 5 stuff is go
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/101359/
---
Review request for KDE Base Apps and KDE Runtime.
Summary
---
I simpl
On Saturday 14 May 2011 09:00:02 Ozan Çağlayan wrote:
> On 14.05.2011 04:55, Raphael Kubo da Costa wrote:
> > Has there been any followup to this?
>
> Nope, not yet.
jriddell has been at the Ubuntu conference all week so that might be why.
John.
How about leaving a redirect to page on techbase that explains that
this is the newer replacement?
Rich,
> On May 14, 2011, 4:01 a.m., Shaun Reich wrote:
> > Are you sure the behaviour for the Qt method 100% equivalent to the
> > current? I ask this because now that the deprecated method forwards to it,
> > naturally it's quite important to make sure nothing gets fscked up.
>
> Nicolas Alvarez wr
On 14.05.2011 04:55, Raphael Kubo da Costa wrote:
>
> Has there been any followup to this?
Nope, not yet.
--
Ozan Caglayan
Pardus Linux
http://www.pardus.org.tr/eng
12 matches
Mail list logo
