---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/101702/#review4073
---
Ship it!
OK.
- David
On June 20, 2011, 11:58 a.m., Sebastian
On Saturday 07 May 2011, Aurélien Gâteau wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As part of my work on the image comparison feature in Gwenview, I want
> to make it possible to restore trashed images from within Gwenview (in
> case the user trashes the wrong image while comparing).
>
> In the past I have been duplicati
> On June 22, 2011, 7 p.m., David Faure wrote:
> > OK.
Just to be clear: does this mean: "push it now" or "push it after the release
of 4.7"?
- Sebastian
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.review
On Sunday 22 May 2011, Kevin Ottens wrote:
> Well, I proposed a workaround in january already, and somehow it got
> forgotten along the way, reattaching it here for reference. If that fixes
> the issue for you guys, I think we really should commit it (although I
> still didn't find the time to inv
On Thursday 02 June 2011, Urban Widmark wrote:
> On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 11:54 AM, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> > one other little "gotcha" is that some unique apps do open a new window
> > when launched a second time, just in the same process. it would be
> > really nice if such applications could not
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/101484/#review4076
---
Ship it!
Hmm, I can't see any mention of order-related preferen
> On June 22, 2011, 8:18 p.m., David Faure wrote:
> > Hmm, I can't see any mention of order-related preference in the help for
> > find_library (`cmake --help-command find_library`). I suppose the right
> > thing to do would be to ask the cmake developers to add this in the
> > documentation,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/101484/#review4078
---
This review has been submitted with commit
2eaa5af4822852124934
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/101625/#review4079
---
This review has been submitted with commit
c41f59b017d9ca24f899
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/101625/#review4081
---
This review has been submitted with commit
9dc77054f75eae7ae1f3
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/101625/#review4082
---
This review has been submitted with commit
7ac1544e33ed242068b8
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 3:36 PM, David Faure wrote:
> On Sunday 22 May 2011, Kevin Ottens wrote:
>> Well, I proposed a workaround in january already, and somehow it got
>> forgotten along the way, reattaching it here for reference. If that fixes
>> the issue for you guys, I think we really should
Hi everyone,
(Apologies for cross posting)
As part of improvements to our infrastructure, KDE Sysadmin will be
moving Bugzilla from it's current server to a new one. This newer
server should enhance the performance of Bugzilla among other things,
and allow us to move forward in the long term with
13 matches
Mail list logo
