On Wednesday 06 June 2012 20:32:49 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> But I'm expecting more people to have an opinion on this. David? Sebas?
> Someone from plasma?
in the initial thread I was in favor of going for Qt 4.8, but I accepted the
opinion of the majority. I would consider it as a bad incident i
El Dimecres, 6 de juny de 2012, a les 15:53:36, Dawit A va escriure:
> On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 2:32 PM, Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> > El Dimecres, 6 de juny de 2012, a les 20:23:48, Laszlo Papp va escriure:
> > > > Do you have a link for that discussion?
> > >
> > > http://lists.kde.org/?l=kde-core
On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 2:32 PM, Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> El Dimecres, 6 de juny de 2012, a les 20:23:48, Laszlo Papp va escriure:
> > > Do you have a link for that discussion?
> >
> > http://lists.kde.org/?l=kde-core-devel&m=132630064116231&w=2
>
> That was in January though, people change thei
On Wednesday 06 June 2012 15:59:16 Alexander Neundorf wrote:
> Can you put a copy of FindLibLZMA.cmake into tier1/karchive/cmake/ ?
Done.
> (it will be in cmake 2.8.9)
That's why I didn't put it initially.
Regards.
--
Kévin Ottens, http://ervin.ipsquad.net
KDAB - proud patron of KDE, http://ww
El Dimecres, 6 de juny de 2012, a les 20:23:48, Laszlo Papp va escriure:
> > Do you have a link for that discussion?
>
> http://lists.kde.org/?l=kde-core-devel&m=132630064116231&w=2
That was in January though, people change their minds :D
I count Dirk and Stephen saying to go with 4.8.
John and
> Do you have a link for that discussion?
http://lists.kde.org/?l=kde-core-devel&m=132630064116231&w=2
Best Regards,
Laszlo Papp
Alexander Neundorf wrote:
> Ah, right.
> Can you put a copy of FindLibLZMA.cmake into tier1/karchive/cmake/ ?
> (it will be in cmake 2.8.9)
> Then we don't need the CMAKE_MODULE_PATH from kdelibs anymore, and
> karchive is more standalone.
>
Or we can bump the dependency to 2.8.9 when the RC 1 co
El Dimecres, 6 de juny de 2012, a les 11:26:32, Laszlo Papp va escriure:
> > To re-iterate, it is policy that any dependency changes are discussed
> > and approved on k-c-d first.
>
> It was discussed and disapproved as far as I understood.
Do you have a link for that discussion?
Albert
>
> Be
On Wednesday, June 06, 2012 10:07:41 AM Kevin Ottens wrote:
...
> > > We completed the following three new frameworks:
> > > * karchive
> >
> > I wouldn't call karchive "complete".
> > It is not splitted.
> > E.g. it uses include dirs from the surrounding kdelibs:
> >
> > include_directories(
>
Dirk Mueller wrote:
> On Tuesday 05 June 2012, Albert Astals Cid wrote:
>
>> On May 19, Dawit Alemayehu commited a change that uses
>> QSslConfiguration::testSslOption that is only available in Qt 4.8
>>
>> This means that both kdelibs 4.8.4 and kdelibs 4.9 now depend in Qt 4.8
>> instead Qt 4.7
On Tuesday 05 June 2012, Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> On May 19, Dawit Alemayehu commited a change that uses
> QSslConfiguration::testSslOption that is only available in Qt 4.8
>
> This means that both kdelibs 4.8.4 and kdelibs 4.9 now depend in Qt 4.8
> instead Qt 4.7
Hi Albert,
thanks for noti
> To re-iterate, it is policy that any dependency changes are discussed
> and approved on k-c-d first.
It was discussed and disapproved as far as I understood.
Best Regards,
Laszlo Papp
On Tuesday 05 June 2012 00:15:19 Alexander Neundorf wrote:
> On Monday, June 04, 2012 10:07:45 PM Kevin Ottens wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > So May was beautiful, so much that I almost forgot to send now my
> > traditional "what happens in the kdelibs splitting" email. That's what you
> > get for spaci
On Monday, June 04, 2012 10:07:45 PM Kevin Ottens wrote:
> Hello,
>
> So May was beautiful, so much that I almost forgot to send now my
> traditional "what happens in the kdelibs splitting" email. That's what you
> get for spacing out in the garden I guess... :-)
>
>
> # May results
> So you're
14 matches
Mail list logo
