On Sunday 10 June 2012, Nicolás Alvarez wrote:
> Why not start now and make the next kdelibs 4.8.5? Releasing a kdelibs
> 4.9 will just add to the confusion of how kdelibs development is
> working.
Because having a kdelibs version different from (and especially lower than) the
KDE SC version mess
El 09/06/2012, a las 10:30, "Aaron J. Seigo" escribió:
On Saturday, June 9, 2012 13:40:29 Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
Am Samstag 09 Juni 2012, 12:57:16 schrieb Aaron J. Seigo:
now, i really don't understand the use of words like stupid and
dumb.
I'll leave the fist fighting to others, and wou
>> Thank you for pushing a bunch of untested huge changes in the "minor"
>> point
>> release. Really appreciated.
>>
> what are those untested changes please?
+1.
Bit of nitpick about wording, but 4.8.4 is a new patch level release, not minor.
Best Regards,
Laszlo Papp
On Saturday 09 June 2012, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> things that change APIs, that do not leave kdelibs non-useful on large %s
> of user systems, etc. would therefore not meet the likely requirements.
> and i say that as someone who is sitting on patches to kparts (written by
> Ivan, not me :) that i
On 09/06/12 21:53, Alex Merry wrote:
> On 09/06/12 14:30, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
>> personally, i think it is completely unnecessary and that we should all get
>> used to it now because it could happen in future that Frameworks are
>> released
>> on a different release cycle to applications so th
On 09/06/12 14:30, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> personally, i think it is completely unnecessary and that we should all get
> used to it now because it could happen in future that Frameworks are released
> on a different release cycle to applications so that "kdelibs version ==
> workspaces version"
On Saturday, 2012-06-09, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> On Saturday, June 9, 2012 17:23:44 Andrey Ponomarenko wrote:
> > I've run the compatibility test against the 4.8.3 and 4.8.4 versions of
> > KDE-libs using the ABI Compliance Checker tool and got the following
>
> > report:
> this is remarkably usef
On Saturday, June 9, 2012 17:23:44 Andrey Ponomarenko wrote:
> I've run the compatibility test against the 4.8.3 and 4.8.4 versions of
> KDE-libs using the ABI Compliance Checker tool and got the following
> report:
this is remarkably useful. thanks! are we running this on every release? if
not,
Hi,
I've run the compatibility test against the 4.8.3 and 4.8.4 versions of
KDE-libs using the ABI Compliance Checker tool and got the following
report:
http://upstream-tracker.org/compat_reports/kde-libs/4.8.3_to_4.8.4/compat_report.html
The report shows that the API/ABI structure is not af
Am Samstag 09 Juni 2012, 12:57:16 schrieb Aaron J. Seigo:
>
> now, i really don't understand the use of words like stupid and dumb.
I'll leave the fist fighting to others, and would like to apologize for my
choice of words.
I still dont think the decision to freeze master was a good or necessar
Am Samstag 09 Juni 2012, 12:37:28 schrieb Albert Astals Cid:
>
> You are all making noise out of nothing, the amount of changes is in the
> same order of magnitude of other releases.
>
> Please stop let's stop throwing shit to the other side of the fence and
> start being constructive
Actually y
Am Samstag 09 Juni 2012, 12:10:40 schrieb Modestas Vainius:
> Hello,
>
> On šeštadienis 09 Birželis 2012 13:01:20 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> > > here at Debian we had a really bad experience with 4.8.4. While 4.8.3
> > > was pretty good, 4.8.4 seemed like a huge step backwards in terms of
> > > st
Am Samstag 09 Juni 2012, 11:58:44 schrieb Kevin Kofler:
> On Saturday 09 June 2012, Modestas Vainius wrote:
> > I don't know yet if any other modules from 4.8.4 has been
> > mis-packaged in the same way
>
> Due to the permanent feature freeze of kdelibs 4, there is actually no
> difference between
On Saturday, June 9, 2012 13:40:29 Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
> Am Samstag 09 Juni 2012, 12:57:16 schrieb Aaron J. Seigo:
> > now, i really don't understand the use of words like stupid and dumb.
>
> I'll leave the fist fighting to others, and would like to apologize for my
> choice of words.
cool
> Just checked the Qt docs for 4.8 and this new method is not marked as
> new in 4.8, bad Qt coder!
Forgot to mention, but should be fixed in the future versions:
https://codereview.qt-project.org/#change,28087
Best Regards,
Laszlo Papp
On Saturday, June 9, 2012 13:10:40 Modestas Vainius wrote:
> > There's no mispackaging. If you followed the list or read the archives
> > before blaming people of wrong doing you'd know that kdelibs for 4.8.4 and
> > 4.8.80 actually come from the same branch.
>
> Thank you for pushing a bunch of u
On Saturday, June 9, 2012 12:20:23 Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
> rewritten or broken. However, imposing this branch weirdness on everyone
> else for pure political reasons is just wrong.
it isn't for political reasons.
kdelibs development is focusing on 5.0. there are no further feature releases
Hi all,
Following a request from the KDE Quality team, the downtime for
Bugzilla will be postponed until Tuesday evening, CEST time.
KDE Identity will still under go down time as scheduled.
Regards,
Ben Cooksley
KDE Sysadmin
On Saturday, June 09, 2012 11:58:44 Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Yes, it's stupid, but it's how the kdelibs maintainers want things to be.
> :-(
There's a difference between "I don't follow the reasoning" or "I don't think
the maintainer's reasons are valid" and "stupid".
Please be more respectful, or
On Saturday 09 June 2012, Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> There is not stupid not weird thing in kdelibs. We simply declared kdelibs
> to be feature perfect and only bugfixes should be happening there.
>
> What's the problem with that?
That no software is ever perfect.
For example, we will NEED the S
El Dissabte, 9 de juny de 2012, a les 12:28:11, Andreas K. Huettel va
escriure:
> Am Samstag 09 Juni 2012, 12:10:40 schrieb Modestas Vainius:
> > Hello,
> >
> > On šeštadienis 09 Birželis 2012 13:01:20 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> > > > here at Debian we had a really bad experience with 4.8.4. Whil
El Dissabte, 9 de juny de 2012, a les 13:10:40, Modestas Vainius va escriure:
> Hello,
>
> On šeštadienis 09 Birželis 2012 13:01:20 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> > > here at Debian we had a really bad experience with 4.8.4. While 4.8.3
> > > was
> > > pretty good, 4.8.4 seemed like a huge step backwa
On 06/09/2012 12:10 PM, Modestas Vainius wrote:
Hello,
On šeštadienis 09 Birželis 2012 13:01:20 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
here at Debian we had a really bad experience with 4.8.4. While 4.8.3 was
pretty good, 4.8.4 seemed like a huge step backwards in terms of
stability (random crashes there and
On sábado, 9 de junho de 2012 12.03.44, Jaime wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Can/Should the DBus introspection Object xmls with deprecated annotations
> com.trolltech.QtDBus
> be updated to
> org.qtproject.QtDBus
>
> before 4.9 is released? Is the conversion valid for Qt4.7?
It isn't.
Don'
Hello,
On šeštadienis 09 Birželis 2012 13:01:20 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> > here at Debian we had a really bad experience with 4.8.4. While 4.8.3 was
> > pretty good, 4.8.4 seemed like a huge step backwards in terms of
> > stability (random crashes there and there). After quick investigation of
>
El Dissabte, 9 de juny de 2012, a les 10:35:15, Modestas Vainius va escriure:
> Hello,
Hi
> here at Debian we had a really bad experience with 4.8.4. While 4.8.3 was
> pretty good, 4.8.4 seemed like a huge step backwards in terms of stability
> (random crashes there and there). After quick invest
On Saturday 09 June 2012, Modestas Vainius wrote:
> I don't know yet if any other modules from 4.8.4 has been
> mis-packaged in the same way
Due to the permanent feature freeze of kdelibs 4, there is actually no
difference between kdelibs 4.8.4 and 4.8.80/4.8.90 other than the version
number, th
Hello,
here at Debian we had a really bad experience with 4.8.4. While 4.8.3 was
pretty good, 4.8.4 seemed like a huge step backwards in terms of stability
(random crashes there and there). After quick investigation of kdelibs 4.8.4
I found the following:
$ diff -uNr kdelibs-4.8.3 kdelibs-4.8.4 |
28 matches
Mail list logo
