Re: Proposed adjustments to our release cycles

2012-06-16 Thread Cornelius Schumacher
On Sunday 17 June 2012 Inge Wallin wrote: > > The reasoning behind the move towards shorter release cycles is exactly the > opposite of how large organizations reason when they select software. > Remember the outcry when Firefox went to its current way of releasing. > When Brazil rolls out KDE to

Re: Proposed adjustments to our release cycles

2012-06-16 Thread Inge Wallin
On Friday, June 15, 2012 13:05:44 Sebastian Kügler wrote: > Hi all, > > During our sprint in Pineda de Mar, we sat down and thought about how our > release cycles relate to the structures in our software, we came up with > the following proposal we'd like you to consider and provide feedback > abo

Re: Review Request: fix for some typos

2012-06-16 Thread Lamarque Vieira Souza
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/105278/#review14799 --- kdeui/actions/kaction.cpp

Re: Proposed adjustments to our release cycles

2012-06-16 Thread Shaun Reich
On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 7:21 AM, Marco Martin wrote: > a part of the plan (kindof a consequency in the long term of the thing > described here) is that it would mean aiming to a state where there are nover > freezes (or well, master is always frozen, depends how you look at ;) > > master should al

Re: Review Request: Add Configure Desktop Search button (to open Nepomuk KCM) into Nepomukcontroller Statuswidget

2012-06-16 Thread Vishesh Handa
> On May 27, 2012, 1:53 p.m., Vishesh Handa wrote: > > nepomuk/kcm/statuswidget.cpp, line 185 > > > > > > Commit these icon changes in a separate patch. (No need to open a > > review request) ping? Any updates on

Re: Proposed adjustments to our release cycles

2012-06-16 Thread Maksim Orlovich
> > Starting with KDE Frameworks 5, we will release Frameworks, Workspaces and > Applications each with their own release cycles. Each of these releases > would > be a set of tarballs of the latest stable versions of the application (or > codebase in more general). > As an example, Frameworks could

Re: Review Request: Avoid QDBusConnection Qt warning message for each KUniqueApplication

2012-06-16 Thread Martin Koller
> On June 15, 2012, 11:38 p.m., Steven Sroka wrote: > > Martin, what's the status of this patch? I think a bunch of bug reports on > > bko are waiting to get closed ;) There was a mail thread on core-devel for this and Thiago Macieira said it's the wrong approach. I'll remove the patch ... -

Re: Proposed adjustments to our release cycles

2012-06-16 Thread Harald Sitter
On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 1:21 PM, Marco Martin wrote: > On Saturday 16 June 2012, Shaun Reich wrote: >> >> and the freezes would have to be *very* well communicated, because >> even now we run into issues with people not realizing that we're in >> string freeze or feature freeze. > > a part of the

Re: Proposed adjustments to our release cycles

2012-06-16 Thread Harald Sitter
Ahoy, On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 1:05 PM, Sebastian Kügler wrote: > Starting with KDE Frameworks 5, we will release Frameworks, Workspaces and > Applications each with their own release cycles. Each of these releases would > be a set of tarballs of the latest stable versions of the application (or >

Re: Proposed adjustments to our release cycles

2012-06-16 Thread Marco Martin
On Saturday 16 June 2012, Shaun Reich wrote: > > and the freezes would have to be *very* well communicated, because > even now we run into issues with people not realizing that we're in > string freeze or feature freeze. a part of the plan (kindof a consequency in the long term of the thing desc

Re: Proposed adjustments to our release cycles

2012-06-16 Thread Jaime
This proposal looks like the X.org release cycle. Each individual component can release as many versions as wanted, and from time to time there will be a global release. 2012/6/16 Shaun Reich : > i like where this is going..i've always wanted a bit more flexibility > in releases... >

Re: Proposed adjustments to our release cycles

2012-06-16 Thread Shaun Reich
i like where this is going..i've always wanted a bit more flexibility in releases... one thing to keep in mind (i realize it's a bit premature to say this, but..) we'd definitely have to make sure we coordinate the various freezes well, since there'd be a dedicated and specialized freeze-timeline

Re: Review Request: fix kio_activities cannot handle utf8 file name/path

2012-06-16 Thread Xuetian Weng
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/105222/#review14775 --- Ping? - Xuetian Weng On June 12, 2012, 1:37 a.m., Xuetian We

Re: Proposed adjustments to our release cycles

2012-06-16 Thread Thomas Lübking
Am 16.06.2012, 06:25 Uhr, schrieb Scott Kitterman : On Friday, June 15, 2012 01:05:44 PM Sebastian Kügler wrote: As an example, Frameworks could release updates every 2 months, while our application collection is updated monthly. New iterations of the workspaces come every four months. (Th