On Sunday 17 June 2012 Inge Wallin wrote:
The reasoning behind the move towards shorter release cycles is exactly the
opposite of how large organizations reason when they select software.
Remember the outcry when Firefox went to its current way of releasing.
When Brazil rolls out KDE to 24
On Friday 15 June 2012 Sebastian Kügler wrote:
Opinions?
The predictability and synchronicity of our current six month release cycle
has a lot of benefits. It allows all contributors as well as consumers of our
releases to plan ahead and minimizes release overhead.
On the other hand it
Dear kcd,
I am thinking for a possible fix for bug #293576 [1], but I could not make
up my mind so far. As far as I understand the situation is as follows:
- There is no explicit way of setting the default file manager for the KDE
workspace; however, there is an implicit way of doing
On 06/16/2012 09:44 PM, Inge Wallin wrote:
My problem is with the second. While some people always want to have the
latest and greatest, I wonder what it will do to stability. You didn't write
anything above about how many bugfix updates any given version would receive.
The shorter the release
On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 9:44 PM, Inge Wallin i...@lysator.liu.se wrote:
As far as I could understand from the above the main ideas are:
- Splitting the SC into 3 parts
- Shortening the release cycles significantly.
It seems to me that a current trend in larger free software projects is to
On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 11:13 AM, Jacopo De Simoi wilder...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear kcd,
I am thinking for a possible fix for bug #293576 [1], but I could not make
up my mind so far. As far as I understand the situation is as follows:
- There is no explicit way of setting the default file
That doesn't quite work, for me at least. See the bug I reported
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=297720
Nobody seems to care though.
On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 12:21 PM, todd rme toddrme2...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 11:13 AM, Jacopo De Simoi wilder...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear
Hi,
We have the Qt Contributors Summit coming next week and I thought we might
want to try co-ordinate our efforts there like we did last year.
I've created a new page at http://community.kde.org/KDE_at_QCS/QCS_2012 for
KDE attendees to put down their details and any issues they want to see
On Saturday, June 16, 2012 08:18:05 Maksim Orlovich wrote:
How do you reconcile this proposal with our current troubles in 4.8.4,
where you need certain particular combinations of two sets of
libraries for things not to blow up? Your proposal increases the
number of combinations in wide use,
On Sunday 17 June 2012 12:21:07 todd rme wrote:
On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 11:13 AM, Jacopo De Simoi wilder...@gmail.com
wrote:
Dear kcd,
I am thinking for a possible fix for bug #293576 [1], but I could not
make
up my mind so far. As far as I understand the situation is as follows:
On Sunday 17 June 2012 03:44:04 Inge Wallin wrote:
As far as I could understand from the above the main ideas are:
- Splitting the SC into 3 parts
Yep.
- Shortening the release cycles significantly.
Nope. The presented numbers were totally made up and random just for
illustration, could
afaics the original forum request turns out to be a misassumption
about what remember does when opening with... - the should or
could be add to associations checkbox (even if that would be done
automatically, just for disambiation)
a mounted media /is/ inode/directory,
if you want to treat things
Am 17.06.2012, 18:18 Uhr, schrieb Jacopo De Simoi wilder...@gmail.com:
a mounted media /is/ inode/directory,
if you want to treat things differently you'd need sth. more advanced
that inspects path or content and runs a special app in case. - bash
script + service file or write sth. with a
On Sunday 17 June 2012 19:17:41 Thomas Lübking wrote:
You want to open directories with the default mime handler just as images
or an mp3, that's why they're there.
If someone sets an rm -rf $1 script as default directory handler, that's
actually his problem - you can't fix stupidity.
I
El Divendres, 15 de juny de 2012, a les 13:05:44, Sebastian Kügler va
escriure:
Hi all,
Hi
During our sprint in Pineda de Mar, we sat down and thought about how our
release cycles relate to the structures in our software, we came up with the
following proposal we'd like you to consider and
I've created a new page at http://community.kde.org/KDE_at_QCS/QCS_2012
I would suggest using QtCS on these wiki pages for consistency. From
the event page:
The Qt Contributors Summit (aka QtCS) is the main event of the Qt Project.
Perhaps, it is just me, but the QtCS 2011 url is broken in
On Monday 18 June 2012 00:26:13 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
My concerns:
* Need more people to do the tarball packaging/releasing (since if you
propose to release that often you can't expect the same person to be doing
packages almost weekly or byweekly given the release dates won't probably
17 matches
Mail list logo