On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 2:59 AM, Thomas Lübking
wrote:
> but I'm willing to
> be enlightened about the striking advances of this integration.
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DesktopTeam/Specs/Intrepid/GuestAccount
2012/8/27 Christoph Feck :
> On Monday 27 August 2012 22:15:18 Daniel Nicoletti wrote:
>> 2012/8/27 Christoph Feck :
>> > I am talking about whatever design mistake is responsible for bug
>> > 242648, which isn't about CUPS at all. Sorry for side-tracking
>> > this thread. I was just thinking that
Am 28.08.2012, 23:35 Uhr, schrieb Albert Astals Cid :
And as been already said nobody is forcing you to use it, you can
disable the feature.
That's not the point. I can take care of myself, thanks.
(And for the records: the tarball code actually defaults to "false" -
security opt-in is appa
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/105976/
---
Review request for kdelibs.
Description
---
The attached patch remove
> On Aug. 26, 2012, 9:35 p.m., Michael Pyne wrote:
> > I've looked over everything and didn't see anything I didn't like. I'd like
> > to apply and and compile and run what little test cases do exist, but
> > git-apply won't run as kdecore/util/{ConfigureChecks,config-util.h}.cmake
> > don't e
On Wednesday, August 29, 2012 00:36:07 Vadim Zhukov wrote:
> 2012/8/28 Thiago Macieira :
> > On terça-feira, 28 de agosto de 2012 12.28.24, Vadim Zhukov wrote:
> >> See the definition of SharedLock structure in kshareddatacache_p.h.
> >> Actually, other union members will not be accessed simultaneo
On quarta-feira, 29 de agosto de 2012 00.36.07, Vadim Zhukov wrote:
> 2012/8/28 Thiago Macieira :
> > On terça-feira, 28 de agosto de 2012 12.28.24, Vadim Zhukov wrote:
> >> See the definition of SharedLock structure in kshareddatacache_p.h.
> >> Actually, other union members will not be accessed s
2012/8/28 Thiago Macieira :
> On terça-feira, 28 de agosto de 2012 12.28.24, Vadim Zhukov wrote:
>> See the definition of SharedLock structure in kshareddatacache_p.h.
>> Actually, other union members will not be accessed simultaneously with
>> spinlock, but compiler doesn't know about that.
>
> I
El Dimarts, 28 d'agost de 2012, a les 01:17:03, Thomas Lübking va escriure:
> Am 28.08.2012, 00:25 Uhr, schrieb Martin Sandsmark
>
> :
> > On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 01:58:57PM +0100, David Edmundson wrote:
> >> Features LightDM-KDE has that KDM does not:
> >> - Guest support login
> >
> > What doe
Am 28.08.2012, 01:56 Uhr, schrieb Daniel Nicoletti :
a) add an eventfilter on the application to suck all input events (for
that
window) so clicking apply etc. isn't possible and the window also will
not
receive close events
b) intercept sigterm and reject it as long as you're waiting for th
On terça-feira, 28 de agosto de 2012 12.28.24, Vadim Zhukov wrote:
> See the definition of SharedLock structure in kshareddatacache_p.h.
> Actually, other union members will not be accessed simultaneously with
> spinlock, but compiler doesn't know about that.
I don't see the need for a union.
The
28.08.2012 12:01 пользователь "Thiago Macieira" написал:
> On segunda-feira, 27 de agosto de 2012 20.29.52, Michael Pyne wrote:
> > On Monday, August 27, 2012 20:18:34 Michael Pyne wrote:
> > > On Tuesday, August 28, 2012 00:41:16 Thiago Macieira wrote:
> > > > QBasicAtomicInt are permitted in uni
On segunda-feira, 27 de agosto de 2012 20.29.52, Michael Pyne wrote:
> On Monday, August 27, 2012 20:18:34 Michael Pyne wrote:
> > On Tuesday, August 28, 2012 00:41:16 Thiago Macieira wrote:
> > > QBasicAtomicInt are permitted in unions. Besides, why do you want it in
> > > a
> > > union in the fir
13 matches
Mail list logo
