Hey everyone
The "nepomuk-core" [1] package was released with KDE SC 4.9. It contains a
ton of new APIs for Nepomuk, along with the apis in kdelibs/nepomuk, under
a new Nepomuk2 namespace.
Luca Beltrame had put me in touch with Simon about this in July and August,
but no progress has been made. I
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/107520/#review23060
---
Ship it!
The code is a lot simpler, therefore this looks prett
On Wednesday, 21 November 2012 19:43:13 CEST, Jan Kundrát wrote:
I'm hereby requesting a review for a move below the extragear/pim.
Hi,
I believe that the only issue which was raised during the review was
incompatible l10n. After applying several rolls of the duck type, the whole
mess appears
Am Mittwoch, 5. Dezember 2012, 15:25:21 schrieb Jan Kundrát:
> On Tuesday, 4 December 2012 13:03:57 CEST, Burkhard Lück wrote:
> > Scripty does not like your message extraction, see
> > ftp://l10n.kde.org/121204.trunk_l10n-kde4.
>
> Hi Burkhard,
> the latest log [1] looks fine to me. Could you ple
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/107276/#review23084
---
Sorry for the late reply, I'm not active in KDE anymore (and so
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/107520/#review23095
---
This review has been submitted with commit
23ba25b6505dc7f46f8
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/107520/#review23096
---
Do i also need to push this to the frameworks branch? If so, ho
On 5 December 2012 22:35, David Faure wrote:
> On Friday 23 November 2012 02:58:36 Diggory Hardy wrote:
> > Dear list,
> >
> > Since this bug — https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=245482 — has not
> been
> > addressed and since it makes KDE's trash somewhat incompatible with other
> > implementa
Hi!
For quite exactly two years I have been working on integrating the
Python scripting language into KDevelop. Recently this project, called
kdev-python, has seen its first stable release (called 1.4 in order to
match kdevplatform version numbers). The release seems to be
successful so far, no cr
> On Dec. 6, 2012, 9:15 p.m., Mark Gaiser wrote:
> > Do i also need to push this to the frameworks branch? If so, how?
> > git checkout KDE/frameworks
> > git pull
> > git checkout
> > git rebase KDE/frameworks
> > git checkout KDE/frameworks
> > git merge
> > git push
> >
> > Just verifying i
Alle giovedì 6 dicembre 2012, Sven Brauch ha scritto:
> If you find any issues, please tell me so I can fix them as quickly
> as possible.
The embedded (and modified) copy of python 2.7.1 does not seem a good
idea... is there *really* no way to use an external (lib)python?
It seems python gets so
> On Dec. 6, 2012, 9:15 p.m., Mark Gaiser wrote:
> > Do i also need to push this to the frameworks branch? If so, how?
> > git checkout KDE/frameworks
> > git pull
> > git checkout
> > git rebase KDE/frameworks
> > git checkout KDE/frameworks
> > git merge
> > git push
> >
> > Just verifying i
> On Dec. 6, 2012, 9:15 p.m., Mark Gaiser wrote:
> > Do i also need to push this to the frameworks branch? If so, how?
> > git checkout KDE/frameworks
> > git pull
> > git checkout
> > git rebase KDE/frameworks
> > git checkout KDE/frameworks
> > git merge
> > git push
> >
> > Just verifying i
On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 8:25 PM, Sven Brauch wrote:
> Hi!
>
> For quite exactly two years I have been working on integrating the
> Python scripting language into KDevelop. Recently this project, called
> kdev-python, has seen its first stable release (called 1.4 in order to
> match kdevplatform ver
>
> Out of the curiosity: how much python3 is available? Thank you for your
> work.
>
python3 _support_
15 matches
Mail list logo
