On May 7, 2013, 12:50 p.m., Dominik Haumann wrote:
The patch itself is fine and most likely does not introduce regressions in
terms of misbehavior.
Still, is never showing an icon the way to go? Another way to work around
this by default would be an additional function called
Hello,I have been working on Kartesio, a program for calculating best fit
curves with experimental points. I think it is ready to be moved in the KDE Edu
main repo now, so I'm asking your approval.I followed the guidelines
(http://techbase.kde.org/Policies/Application_Lifecycle) and Kartesio is
On May 7, 2013, 12:50 p.m., Dominik Haumann wrote:
The patch itself is fine and most likely does not introduce regressions in
terms of misbehavior.
Still, is never showing an icon the way to go? Another way to work around
this by default would be an additional function called
On May 7, 2013, 8:50 a.m., Dominik Haumann wrote:
The patch itself is fine and most likely does not introduce regressions in
terms of misbehavior.
Still, is never showing an icon the way to go? Another way to work around
this by default would be an additional function called
Hi,
I am wondering what is the user base for this application as it seems quite
specialized (I did not build it yet though). Can you tell us more about the
potential target? Another question that comes to mind is: can't it be a feature
of an existing KDE Edu apps?
Best regards,
Anne-Marie
Quite Unlikely ...
It's a Solver, to fit curves into points, That's very used in any
theorical research, engeniering, math, phisics, etc.
2013/5/10 Anne-Marie Mahfouf annemarie.mahf...@free.fr
Hi,
I am wondering what is the user base for this application as it seems
quite specialized
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/110083/
---
(Updated May 10, 2013, 10:32 a.m.)
Review request for kdelibs and
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/110083/#review32310
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Kevin Krammer
On May 10, 2013, 10:32
Hi,
A few primary remarks:
- libzorbaneural is needed but my distro does not have anything with neural
in it (OpenSuse 12.3) what repo do I need to add in order to get it? The
libzorbaneural website should be added to the cmake file so people can find
this and packagers can add it to their
The app sounds awesome.
From the application life cycle page you linked:
When you have made one of more releases and want to continue to develop it,
the term 'playground' does no longer apply to you. That is the right time to
move out of here
There are no releases on download.kde.org under
Annma, I find that proposal *very* good.
I'm a bit distant of KDE programming - I know - because my day job is
making me work 12h+ creating scientific tools.
( actually - one of the tools that I created here was a... Solver, to fit
curves on points... )
Tomaz
2013/5/10 David Edmundson
Hey!
A good thing, I think such a tool could be useful to me too (and I
know a lot of other people to whom it might be useful). Here's what I
noticed from a quick look (some has been said already I think):
* You probably shouldn't track the kdev4 file in the repository, same
goes for screenshots
On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 3:38 PM, LucaTringali tringalinv...@libero.it wrote:
The fact is that, before releasing the first binary package, I would like to
be
sure the code respects KDE guidelines. Otherwise, I would need to create a
second package just to adjust the code for KDE.
Luca
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/110083/#review32318
---
CMakeLists.txt
Hi Luca,
Yes, the correct way to express a power is ^. So you should write x^2.
I figured that after it had crashed ;)
There should be a check routine to avoid that a dangerous string like
** is used, and I'm surely integrating this check in the next release.
In my opinion you should not
On May 7, 2013, 10:11 a.m., Róbert Szókovács wrote:
The solution is intentionally shy, I really don't want to fan the flames
surrounding this issue. I just stumbled upon this location when it can be
handled painlessly. Whether or not it should be turned on by default, in my
opinion,
On May 7, 2013, 10:11 a.m., Róbert Szókovács wrote:
The solution is intentionally shy, I really don't want to fan the flames
surrounding this issue. I just stumbled upon this location when it can be
handled painlessly. Whether or not it should be turned on by default, in my
opinion,
On May 7, 2013, 12:50 p.m., Dominik Haumann wrote:
The patch itself is fine and most likely does not introduce regressions in
terms of misbehavior.
Still, is never showing an icon the way to go? Another way to work around
this by default would be an additional function called
18 matches
Mail list logo
