---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/110785/#review33624
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- David Faure
On June 2, 2013, 4:19 p.m.,
On Monday 20 May 2013 11:53:18 Alexander Neundorf wrote:
> there was a review request for a find-module for libusb1 here a few days
> ago, which we have already in e-c-m, but he can't use it because it is not
> released
Could we maybe release a first version of ECM with only find modules, and
wi
On Monday 03 June 2013 12:34:46 David Faure wrote:
> On Monday 20 May 2013 11:53:18 Alexander Neundorf wrote:
> > there was a review request for a find-module for libusb1 here a few days
> > ago, which we have already in e-c-m, but he can't use it because it is
> > not
> > released
>
> Could we m
David Faure wrote:
> On Monday 20 May 2013 11:53:18 Alexander Neundorf wrote:
>> there was a review request for a find-module for libusb1 here a few days
>> ago, which we have already in e-c-m, but he can't use it because it is
>> not released
>
> Could we maybe release a first version of ECM wi
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/110799/
---
Review request for KDE Base Apps and David Faure.
Description
---
Sin
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/110813/
---
Review request for kde-workspace.
Description
---
A patch that adds t
On Monday 03 June 2013, Christophe Giboudeaux wrote:
> On Monday 03 June 2013 12:34:46 David Faure wrote:
> > On Monday 20 May 2013 11:53:18 Alexander Neundorf wrote:
> > > there was a review request for a find-module for libusb1 here a few
> > > days ago, which we have already in e-c-m, but he ca
On Monday 03 June 2013, Christophe Giboudeaux wrote:
> On Monday 03 June 2013 12:34:46 David Faure wrote:
> > On Monday 20 May 2013 11:53:18 Alexander Neundorf wrote:
> > > there was a review request for a find-module for libusb1 here a few
> > > days ago, which we have already in e-c-m, but he ca
On Wednesday 29 May 2013 16:13:23 Harald Sitter wrote:
> As you may be aware phonon supports building the phonon4 API against Qt5 by
> building the phonon4qt5 branch.
>
> Due to consolidation efforts at the Phonon sprint last weekend the
> phonon4qt5 transitional library is now merged into the mas
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/110785/#review33712
---
This review has been submitted with commit
2e0479ed8ed34f89ac2
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/110785/
---
(Updated June 4, 2013, 3:42 a.m.)
Status
--
This change has been mark
11 matches
Mail list logo