On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 2:52 PM, Dawit A ada...@kde.org wrote:
On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 1:45 PM, Albert Astals Cid aa...@kde.org wrote:
El Dimarts, 10 de desembre de 2013, a les 08:57:47, Dawit A va escriure:
Sorry for the late response. I did not see this email for some reason.
None
of
Hi all,
Just a little notice that kdepimlibs has been force pushed to reverse a
change which had broken the KDE/4.12 release. Due to the nature of the
change, a force push was the only method usable to correct it.
To adjust your local clones, please perform the following.
git remote update
git
Hi guys, seems that 4.12 is hit by a pretty bad regression in
KItemWidgetDelegate (patches that don't seem to have been reviewed, but I
won't fight that now)
More info at https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=328528
It seems we're not going to have a fix for today, that is when we are supposed
Great. I will commit the patch once I get a chance then. Unless of course
either you or Albert has already done so.
On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 3:30 AM, Ben Cooksley bcooks...@kde.org wrote:
On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 2:52 PM, Dawit A ada...@kde.org wrote:
On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 1:45 PM, Albert
El Dimecres, 11 de desembre de 2013, a les 13:59:57, Dawit A va escriure:
Great. I will commit the patch once I get a chance then. Unless of course
either you or Albert has already done so.
I just did it.
Cheers,
Albert
On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 3:30 AM, Ben Cooksley bcooks...@kde.org
On Wednesday 11 December 2013 19:59:51 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
Hi guys, seems that 4.12 is hit by a pretty bad regression in
KItemWidgetDelegate (patches that don't seem to have been reviewed, but I
won't fight that now)
More info at https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=328528
It seems
El Dimecres, 11 de desembre de 2013, a les 20:20:54, Martin Graesslin va
escriure:
On Wednesday 11 December 2013 19:59:51 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
Hi guys, seems that 4.12 is hit by a pretty bad regression in
KItemWidgetDelegate (patches that don't seem to have been reviewed, but I
won't
On Mittwoch, 11. Dezember 2013 20:41:28 CEST, Albert Astals Cid wrote:
I am hoping that Andras would let us just revert his changes
since reading the
commit logs seems like they are only optimizations that ended
up wrong (i.e. i hope he wasn't really doing any bugfix).
Depends on how fast
El Dimecres, 11 de desembre de 2013, a les 21:06:20, Thomas Lübking va
escriure:
On Mittwoch, 11. Dezember 2013 20:41:28 CEST, Albert Astals Cid wrote:
I am hoping that Andras would let us just revert his changes
since reading the
commit logs seems like they are only optimizations that
El Dimecres, 11 de desembre de 2013, a les 21:45:42, Albert Astals Cid va
escriure:
El Dimecres, 11 de desembre de 2013, a les 21:06:20, Thomas Lübking va
escriure:
On Mittwoch, 11. Dezember 2013 20:41:28 CEST, Albert Astals Cid wrote:
I am hoping that Andras would let us just revert his
On Wednesday 11 December 2013 22:37:15 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
Actually i've changed my mind, too much people has already upped
the version numbers and done preparations, so i've just reverted
the commits from Andras and will tag 4.12.0 with that.
If Andras appears and says his commits fix
11 matches
Mail list logo
