> On Dec. 13, 2013, 2:27 p.m., Frank Reininghaus wrote:
> > Thanks for looking into this, Dawit! I greatly appreciate this effort.
> >
> >
> > Two questions come to my mind:
> >
> > 1. Why should these dialogs be modal at all? Everything that KIO does is
> > asynchronous, so it could very wel
On Dec 12, 2013 6:36 PM, "Vishesh Handa" wrote:
> >
> > i’ll say it again here so that it is at least on record: i really
disagree
> > with renaming Nepomuk. call it Nepomuk 2 or whatever, but tossing aside
> > name recognition and years of messaging is doing the promo teams a
massive
> > disservi
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/114519/
---
Review request for kdelibs.
Bugs: 328263
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/114472/#review45855
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Martin Tobias Holmedahl Sandsmark
On De
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113866/#review45846
---
Ship it!
Looks good, please push to KDE 4.12, I'll merge upwar
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/114506/#review45845
---
I'd say that adding unit tests never hurts :-) I can't really c
> On Dec. 13, 2013, 2:27 p.m., Frank Reininghaus wrote:
> > Thanks for looking into this, Dawit! I greatly appreciate this effort.
> >
> >
> > Two questions come to my mind:
> >
> > 1. Why should these dialogs be modal at all? Everything that KIO does is
> > asynchronous, so it could very wel
