Re: Moving Baloo forward

2014-01-17 Thread Martin Klapetek
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 1:47 AM, Albert Astals Cid aa...@kde.org wrote: Thus my suggestion is that after we get the wiki done and we explain clearly the situation as Thomas Lübking suggested (i.e. if you really really really really need what Nepomuk provides and can't accept a single

Re: Moving Baloo forward

2014-01-17 Thread Kevin Krammer
On Friday, 2014-01-17, 01:47:17, Albert Astals Cid wrote: If we move now, in one year we will have had 1 year of real usage uncovering bugs and 1 year of bugfixes. If we move in one year, we will have lost that 1 year of real usage (since few people will be using it) and so in one year we

Re: Moving Baloo and Baloo-widgets into KDE SC

2014-01-17 Thread Mario Fux KDE ML
Am Freitag, 10. Januar 2014, 11.28:34 schrieb Sebastian Kügler: Hey, Morning sebas and Co Here finally my answer to this thread. [snip] - Digikam (gets new Nepomuk with 4.0.0 due in May or so. Will it work)? Maybe this feature is worth delaying then? Is anybody of the Digikam team

Re: Review Request 114623: kjs: Implement es6 Math.fround

2014-01-17 Thread Aleix Pol Gonzalez
On Dec. 24, 2013, 1:13 p.m., Martin Tobias Holmedahl Sandsmark wrote: what a silly function, but looks okay to me. Shouldn't this go to KF5? Also kdelibs is feature frozen... - Aleix --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To

Re: Review Request 114623: kjs: Implement es6 Math.fround

2014-01-17 Thread Martin Tobias Holmedahl Sandsmark
On Dec. 24, 2013, 1:13 p.m., Martin Tobias Holmedahl Sandsmark wrote: what a silly function, but looks okay to me. Aleix Pol Gonzalez wrote: Shouldn't this go to KF5? Also kdelibs is feature frozen... yes, it should go into kf5 as well, but it was decided some time ago that

Review Request 115079: don't install dbus interface files in kglobalaccel

2014-01-17 Thread Jonathan Riddell
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115079/ --- Review request for kde-workspace and Martin Gräßlin. Repository:

Re: Moving Baloo forward

2014-01-17 Thread Vishesh Handa
Hey Albert Thanks for sending this email. On Friday 17 January 2014 01:47:17 Albert Astals Cid wrote: Hi guys, seems we have reached a kind of impasse regarding what to do with Baloo and Nepomuk. Since the 4.13 freeze is coming sooner than you think (less than 6 weeks) I'd like to try to get

Re: Moving Baloo and Baloo-widgets into KDE SC

2014-01-17 Thread Vishesh Handa
On Friday 17 January 2014 11:54:06 Mario Fux KDE ML wrote: Am Freitag, 10. Januar 2014, 11.28:34 schrieb Sebastian Kügler: Hey, Morning sebas and Co Here finally my answer to this thread. [snip] - Digikam (gets new Nepomuk with 4.0.0 due in May or so. Will it work)? Maybe

Moving KFIleMetadata into KDE SC

2014-01-17 Thread Vishesh Handa
Hey guys I should have posted this with the Baloo thread, but since I did not - WIth KDE SC 4.10, Nepomuk dropped support for Strigi and implemented their own indexing library. This code was part of nepomuk-core. With Baloo, this code has been migrated into its own repository called

Re: Review Request 115079: don't install dbus interface files in kglobalaccel

2014-01-17 Thread Thomas Lübking
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115079/#review47586 --- there's no diff - should there be? - Thomas Lübking On

Re: Moving Baloo forward

2014-01-17 Thread Jos Poortvliet
On Friday 17 January 2014 17:50:38 Vishesh Handa wrote: Hey Albert Thanks for sending this email. On Friday 17 January 2014 01:47:17 Albert Astals Cid wrote: Hi guys, seems we have reached a kind of impasse regarding what to do with Baloo and Nepomuk. Since the 4.13 freeze is coming

Re: Moving Baloo forward

2014-01-17 Thread Christoph Feck
On Friday 17 January 2014 17:50:38 Vishesh Handa wrote: On Friday 17 January 2014 01:47:17 Albert Astals Cid wrote: I guess that most of the answers can be extracted from the emails of the discussion, but having a central place that people can go and read surely helps.