Re: Review Request 113969: Do not assume every items have the same height

2014-04-22 Thread Yichao Yu
On April 6, 2014, 7:48 a.m., David Faure wrote: kdeui/itemviews/kcategorizedview.cpp, line 795 https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113969/diff/4/?file=215105#file215105line795 Coding style comment: some code paths use break (which results in return QModelIndex() at the end) and

Re: Review Request 113969: Do not assume every items have the same height

2014-04-22 Thread Yichao Yu
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113969/ --- (Updated April 22, 2014, 6:13 a.m.) Review request for kdelibs, David

Re: Review Request 117091: Force the screen locker's greeter to show the password input field in case of immediateLock

2014-04-22 Thread Wolfgang Bauer
On March 26, 2014, 11:07 p.m., Thomas Lübking wrote: you could sighup or sigusr the greeter process and have it setImmediateLock(true); desktopResized(); in return Wolfgang Bauer wrote: I agree, this would be a bit nicer... But I tried it and cannot get it to work.

Re: Review Request 117091: Force the screen locker's greeter to show the password input field in case of immediateLock

2014-04-22 Thread Thomas Lübking
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/117091/#review56190 --- see minor nitpicks, but in general the patch seems fine and

Re: Review Request 117091: Force the screen locker's greeter to show the password input field in case of immediateLock

2014-04-22 Thread Wolfgang Bauer
On April 22, 2014, 7:34 p.m., Thomas Lübking wrote: ksmserver/screenlocker/greeter/main.cpp, line 89 https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/117091/diff/2/?file=262501#file262501line89 ooc.: what's wrong about just: signal(SIGUSR1, signalHandler); ? signal() is deprecated,

Re: Review Request 117091: Force the screen locker's greeter to show the password input field in case of immediateLock

2014-04-22 Thread Thomas Lübking
On April 22, 2014, 5:34 p.m., Thomas Lübking wrote: ksmserver/screenlocker/greeter/main.cpp, line 89 https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/117091/diff/2/?file=262501#file262501line89 ooc.: what's wrong about just: signal(SIGUSR1, signalHandler); ? Wolfgang Bauer wrote:

Re: Review Request 117091: Force the screen locker's greeter to show the password input field in case of immediateLock

2014-04-22 Thread Thomas Lübking
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/117091/#review56209 --- ksmserver/screenlocker/greeter/main.cpp

Re: Review Request 117091: Force the screen locker's greeter to show the password input field in case of immediateLock

2014-04-22 Thread Wolfgang Bauer
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/117091/ --- (Updated April 22, 2014, 9:56 p.m.) Review request for kde-workspace,

Re: Review Request 117091: Force the screen locker's greeter to show the password input field in case of immediateLock

2014-04-22 Thread Wolfgang Bauer
On April 22, 2014, 9:48 p.m., Thomas Lübking wrote: ksmserver/screenlocker/greeter/main.cpp, line 38 https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/117091/diff/3/?file=267733#file267733line38 /me would not insist on newline, but there needs to be a blank after the if if (!m_instance)

Re: Review Request 117091: Force the screen locker's greeter to show the password input field in case of immediateLock

2014-04-22 Thread Wolfgang Bauer
On April 22, 2014, 7:34 p.m., Thomas Lübking wrote: ksmserver/screenlocker/greeter/main.cpp, line 89 https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/117091/diff/2/?file=262501#file262501line89 ooc.: what's wrong about just: signal(SIGUSR1, signalHandler); ? Wolfgang Bauer wrote:

Re: Review Request 117091: Force the screen locker's greeter to show the password input field in case of immediateLock

2014-04-22 Thread Thomas Lübking
On April 22, 2014, 5:34 p.m., Thomas Lübking wrote: ksmserver/screenlocker/greeter/main.cpp, line 89 https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/117091/diff/2/?file=262501#file262501line89 ooc.: what's wrong about just: signal(SIGUSR1, signalHandler); ? Wolfgang Bauer wrote:

Review Request 117644: screenlocker: don't leave behind screensaver processes

2014-04-22 Thread Wolfgang Bauer
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/117644/ --- Review request for kde-workspace and Plasma. Bugs: 224200

Re: Review Request 117644: screenlocker: don't leave behind screensaver processes

2014-04-22 Thread Wolfgang Bauer
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/117644/ --- (Updated April 22, 2014, 10:41 p.m.) Review request for kde-workspace

Re: Review Request 117091: Force the screen locker's greeter to show the password input field in case of immediateLock

2014-04-22 Thread Wolfgang Bauer
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/117091/ --- (Updated April 22, 2014, 10:34 p.m.) Review request for kde-workspace,

Re: Review Request 117644: screenlocker: don't leave behind screensaver processes

2014-04-22 Thread Thomas Lübking
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/117644/#review56219 --- Ship it! from here - see veto condition in the other RR (i

Re: Review Request 117644: screenlocker: don't leave behind screensaver processes

2014-04-22 Thread Martin Gräßlin
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/117644/#review56240 --- would you please also adapt that for plasma-workspace repo

Re: Review Request 117091: Force the screen locker's greeter to show the password input field in case of immediateLock

2014-04-22 Thread Martin Gräßlin
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/117091/#review56241 --- Is that only relevant for the legacy (XSS) locker or also for