On 13.09.2014 21:34, Martin Gräßlin wrote:
I also see that I should have elaborated more. I had written more and removed
it before sending the mail.
I just wanted to say thanks for a well thought-out reply - I
didn't reply in turn because the discussion continued on the
other fork, and it's p
On Saturday 13 September 2014 23:29:55 David Edmundson wrote:
> On 12 Sep 2014 22:53, "Marco Martin" wrote:
> > On Tuesday, September 9, 2014, Jan Kundrát wrote:
> > > If you would like all plasma to go, just give me a list of repos and I
> >
> > can make it happen.
> >
> > No, definitely not y
On 12 Sep 2014 22:53, "Marco Martin" wrote:
> On Tuesday, September 9, 2014, Jan Kundrát wrote:
> >
> > If you would like all plasma to go, just give me a list of repos and I
> can make it happen.
>
> No, definitely not yet
>
> >
> > In my opinion, the purpose of this test is not to verify that
On 13.09.2014 22:50, Sven Brauch wrote:
That's my opinion as well. It would be nice to have an explicit way to
differentiate the "I think this patch is okay, but I'm not very
familiar with the code you changed" (+1) and "I'm confident this patch
is fine" (+2) cases, and I think everyone with a
> Everyone with a KDE developer account should in principle have
> the right to give a +2. One should only use it when appropriate though, i.e.
> when one is the maintainer of a given piece of code or when the patch is
> simple enough so that one feels safe to give the other the ship-it.
That's my
On Sunday 14 September 2014 08:11:43 Ben Cooksley wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 14, 2014 at 8:07 AM, Ivan Čukić wrote:
> >> that needs to be reverted because it's actively objectiona-
> >> ble. As Ivan pointed out, few of us will ever commit any-
> >> thing if we're not confident it would meet with the app
On Sun, Sep 14, 2014 at 8:07 AM, Ivan Čukić wrote:
>
>> that needs to be reverted because it's actively objectiona-
>> ble. As Ivan pointed out, few of us will ever commit any-
>> thing if we're not confident it would meet with the approval
>
> While I do agree that we have a strange and unreally
> that needs to be reverted because it's actively objectiona-
> ble. As Ivan pointed out, few of us will ever commit any-
> thing if we're not confident it would meet with the approval
While I do agree that we have a strange and unreally awesome community that
behaves really well (and I do trust
On Sun, Sep 14, 2014 at 7:20 AM, Nicolás Alvarez
wrote:
> 2014-09-13 15:57 GMT-03:00 Milian Wolff :
>> On Saturday 13 September 2014 14:38:03 Nicolás Alvarez wrote:
>>> 2014-09-13 14:25 GMT-03:00 Milian Wolff :
>>> > Hey all,
>>> >
>>> > I hope this is the right place to ask. I would like to start
On 13.09.2014 21:10, Kevin Krammer wrote:
So your suggestion would be to not have +2 but a policy of some sort that only
the +1 of the maintainer, if there is an active one, is considered as "go
ahead"?
Basically my thinking is roughly this: It actually happens
extremely rarely in practice th
On Saturday 13 September 2014 20:38:21 Eike Hein wrote:
> The argument "but you can still bypass Gerrit and push
> directly, this is just social etiquette" doesn't matter
> because the whole thing is about social etiquette. The
> ACLs we already have reflect our social etiquette, and
> that means w
2014-09-13 15:57 GMT-03:00 Milian Wolff :
> On Saturday 13 September 2014 14:38:03 Nicolás Alvarez wrote:
>> 2014-09-13 14:25 GMT-03:00 Milian Wolff :
>> > Hey all,
>> >
>> > I hope this is the right place to ask. I would like to start using
>> > todo.kde.org more. It's imo a good place to track jo
On Saturday, 2014-09-13, 20:38:21, Eike Hein wrote:
> These things reinforce each other in multiple ways. If main-
> tainers are not entrenched positions, they're easy to replace
> when they move on (whether they can accept this themselves or
> not). Once you codify them in ACLs (and yes, we do th
On Saturday 13 September 2014 14:38:03 Nicolás Alvarez wrote:
> 2014-09-13 14:25 GMT-03:00 Milian Wolff :
> > Hey all,
> >
> > I hope this is the right place to ask. I would like to start using
> > todo.kde.org more. It's imo a good place to track jobs that need to be
> > done. I did not figure ou
On 13.09.2014 20:21, Ivan Čukić wrote:
I agree, +2 should be retained by the maintainer, or a smaller set of
developers as decided by the maintainer.
Or perhaps it simply turns out that the whole idea of
*having* a '+2' is incompatible with the KDE community
in the first place.
Do we really
On Saturday, 2014-09-13, 17:49:31, Martin Gräßlin wrote:
> On Saturday 13 September 2014 16:51:15 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> > El Divendres, 12 de setembre de 2014, a les 22:52:40, Marco Martin va
> >
> > escriure:
> > > On Tuesday, September 9, 2014, Jan Kundrát wrote:
> > > > If you would like
On 13.09.2014 17:49, Martin Gräßlin wrote:
my understanding was that it's still possible to bypass the code review, so I
cannot see that it's against the KDE Manifesto as it's only a kind of social
contract. Or am I missing something.
Personally I like the idea of having the +2 limited to the
> my understanding was that it's still possible to bypass the code review, so
> I cannot see that it's against the KDE Manifesto as it's only a kind of
> social contract. Or am I missing something.
>
> Personally I like the idea of having the +2 limited to the devs familiar
> with the code.
I ag
2014-09-13 14:25 GMT-03:00 Milian Wolff :
> Hey all,
>
> I hope this is the right place to ask. I would like to start using
> todo.kde.org more. It's imo a good place to track jobs that need to be done. I
> did not figure out how to add categories though. Can we somehow give project
> admins (see p
Hey all,
I hope this is the right place to ask. I would like to start using
todo.kde.org more. It's imo a good place to track jobs that need to be done. I
did not figure out how to add categories though. Can we somehow give project
admins (see projects.kde.org) the required rights to that websi
On Saturday 13 September 2014 16:51:15 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> El Divendres, 12 de setembre de 2014, a les 22:52:40, Marco Martin va
>
> escriure:
> > On Tuesday, September 9, 2014, Jan Kundrát wrote:
> > > If you would like all plasma to go, just give me a list of repos and I
> >
> > can mak
El Divendres, 12 de setembre de 2014, a les 22:52:40, Marco Martin va
escriure:
> On Tuesday, September 9, 2014, Jan Kundrát wrote:
> > If you would like all plasma to go, just give me a list of repos and I
>
> can make it happen.
>
> No, definitely not yet
>
> > In my opinion, the purpose of
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/120182/
---
Review request for kdelibs and David Faure.
Bugs: 336529
http://bugs.
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/120178/
---
Review request for kdelibs.
Bugs: 337198
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug
24 matches
Mail list logo
