---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/120528/
---
Review request for KDE Software on Mac OS X and Qt KDE.
Repository: qt
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/120529/
---
Review request for KDE Software on Mac OS X and Qt KDE.
Repository: qt
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/120528/#review68076
---
To get changes into Qt, you directly create the review
On Oct. 8, 2014, 11:47 a.m., Christoph Feck wrote:
To get changes into Qt, you directly create the review requests on the
qt-project.org site: http://qt-project.org/wiki/Gerrit-Introduction
Ignore that comment... :P
- Christoph
On Oct. 8, 2014, 1:47 p.m., Christoph Feck wrote:
To get changes into Qt, you directly create the review requests on the
qt-project.org site: http://qt-project.org/wiki/Gerrit-Introduction
Christoph Feck wrote:
Ignore that comment... :P
Ok.
Or rather, I'll jump on the occasion to
On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 3:13 PM, Thomas Pfeiffer thomas.pfeif...@kde.org
wrote:
On Sunday 05 October 2014 20:30:33 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
The reasoning is that this way they will be released together with
Plasma
Workspace.
I don't see that anyone can have a problem with
El Dimecres, 8 d'octubre de 2014, a les 21:02:32, Aleix Pol va escriure:
On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 3:13 PM, Thomas Pfeiffer thomas.pfeif...@kde.org
wrote:
On Sunday 05 October 2014 20:30:33 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
The reasoning is that this way they will be released together with
On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 11:59 PM, Jeremy Whiting jpwhit...@kde.org wrote:
Kevin, Others,
Libkomparediff2 has been ported to kf5 for quite some time, kdevelop
or kdevplatform frameworks based code (not sure if it's master or
frameworks branches) uses it and it seems to work ok there. I wonder
On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 9:59 PM, Albert Astals Cid aa...@kde.org wrote:
El Dimecres, 8 d'octubre de 2014, a les 21:02:32, Aleix Pol va escriure:
On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 3:13 PM, Thomas Pfeiffer thomas.pfeif...@kde.org
wrote:
On Sunday 05 October 2014 20:30:33 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
El Dimecres, 8 d'octubre de 2014, a les 22:23:44, Aleix Pol va escriure:
On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 9:59 PM, Albert Astals Cid aa...@kde.org wrote:
El Dimecres, 8 d'octubre de 2014, a les 21:02:32, Aleix Pol va escriure:
On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 3:13 PM, Thomas Pfeiffer thomas.pfeif...@kde.org
Aleix Pol ha scritto:
On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 9:59 PM, Albert Astals Cid aa...@kde.org
mailto:aa...@kde.org wrote:
El Dimecres, 8 d'octubre de 2014, a les 21:02:32, Aleix Pol va escriure:
On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 3:13 PM, Thomas Pfeiffer
thomas.pfeif...@kde.org
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/120535/
---
(Updated Oct. 8, 2014, 3:20 p.m.)
Review request for KDE Frameworks,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/120535/#review68095
---
According to
Hi Aleix, hi everyone,
On Wednesday 08 October 2014 at 22:08:58, Aleix Pol wrote:
I think we're aiming for 2nd quarter of 2015, it depends a lot on when we
manage to have a sprint I'd say. Things are going forward, but there's
still work to be done.
So that will likely be after the next
On Oct. 8, 2014, 3:22 p.m., Albert Astals Cid wrote:
According to
https://techbase.kde.org/Policies/Binary_Compatibility_Issues_With_C++
changing the const/volatile qualifiers of the function is BIC
Now the thing is if we allow BIC changes in frameworks like attica or not
is for
K, sounds like we've agreed then, libkomparediff2 frameworks branch
wont merge to master until some time after 14.12 is tagged and such.
If I find a few minutes I'll take a look at improving the api and such
as Aleix noted.
BR,
Jeremy
On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 3:25 PM, Kevin Kofler
On Oct. 8, 2014, 9:22 p.m., Albert Astals Cid wrote:
According to
https://techbase.kde.org/Policies/Binary_Compatibility_Issues_With_C++
changing the const/volatile qualifiers of the function is BIC
Now the thing is if we allow BIC changes in frameworks like attica or not
is for
On Oct. 8, 2014, 3:22 p.m., Albert Astals Cid wrote:
According to
https://techbase.kde.org/Policies/Binary_Compatibility_Issues_With_C++
changing the const/volatile qualifiers of the function is BIC
Now the thing is if we allow BIC changes in frameworks like attica or not
is for
On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 11:48 PM, Jeremy Whiting jpwhit...@kde.org wrote:
K, sounds like we've agreed then, libkomparediff2 frameworks branch
wont merge to master until some time after 14.12 is tagged and such.
If I find a few minutes I'll take a look at improving the api and such
as Aleix
El Dijous, 9 d'octubre de 2014, a les 00:12:03, Aleix Pol va escriure:
On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 11:48 PM, Jeremy Whiting jpwhit...@kde.org wrote:
K, sounds like we've agreed then, libkomparediff2 frameworks branch
wont merge to master until some time after 14.12 is tagged and such.
If I
Aleix,
Yes, master is what will be released with KDE Applications 14.12 so it
needs to stay qt4 based for now since kompare itself will be in this
upcoming release.
BR,
Jeremy
On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 4:14 PM, Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at wrote:
On Thursday 09 October 2014 at 00:12:03,
Hey all,
In updating some frameworks I took a look at the kdelibs coding style
(Is there a frameworks coding style, if not maybe it should be
created?) and especially the Qt Includes section seems a bit backwards
from what I see in actual code in frameworks.
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/120431/
---
(Updated Oct. 9, 2014, 12:06 a.m.)
Review request for KDE Software on
On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 12:13 AM, Albert Astals Cid aa...@kde.org wrote:
El Dijous, 9 d'octubre de 2014, a les 00:12:03, Aleix Pol va escriure:
On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 11:48 PM, Jeremy Whiting jpwhit...@kde.org
wrote:
K, sounds like we've agreed then, libkomparediff2 frameworks branch
On Oct. 7, 2014, 1:13 p.m., Thomas Lübking wrote:
drkonqi/bugzillalib.cpp, line 81
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/120431/diff/4/?file=316623#file316623line81
The patch largely consists of hand-crafted version handling.
replacing this by int version =
On Oct. 7, 2014, 1:13 p.m., Thomas Lübking wrote:
My 2¢
Bugzilla will require an update anyway and that means at some point it'll
be (then silently) broken in KDE SC4 again and somebody has to step up
and fix it with another patch.
In the meantime we've diverging codebases for KDE 4
26 matches
Mail list logo
