On 05/01/2015, at 10:45 AM, Cornelius Schumacher wrote:
> On Sunday 04 January 2015 13:38:09 Jeff Mitchell wrote:
>> I do agree that we want the barrier to entry to be as low as possible.
>> As is often the case, I think that may conflict somewhat with what some
>> of the more/very experienced dev
On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 2:41 PM, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> On Saturday 03 January 2015 15:35:12 Jeff Mitchell wrote:
>> > - Not needing a CLI tool in an "obscure language" (PHP, Java,
>> > .NET,...).
>>
>> .NET is a framework, not a language. Maybe you meant C#. Regardless, I
>> fail to see how any
On Saturday 03 January 2015 15:35:12 Jeff Mitchell wrote:
> > - Not needing a CLI tool in an "obscure language" (PHP, Java,
> > .NET,...).
>
> .NET is a framework, not a language. Maybe you meant C#. Regardless, I
> fail to see how any of those are "obscure". They're three of the most
> popular
On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 12:45 PM, Cornelius Schumacher
wrote:
> On Sunday 04 January 2015 13:38:09 Jeff Mitchell wrote:
>>
>> GitHub has been mentioned as a comparison point, but I can't credibly
>> believe that we're willing to migrate to GitHub en masse, no matter what
>> the flow of the industry
On Sunday 04 January 2015 13:38:09 Jeff Mitchell wrote:
>
> GitHub has been mentioned as a comparison point, but I can't credibly
> believe that we're willing to migrate to GitHub en masse, no matter what
> the flow of the industry is. I'm not stating my personal preferences on
> the matter, but t
On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 4:15 AM, Cornelius Schumacher wrote:
> On Saturday 03 January 2015 15:31:26 Ben Cooksley wrote:
>> (...excellent summary of discussion...)
>>
>> Commentary on the above would be appreciated.
>
> There are two questions which aren't addressed int he summary, but which I
> thi
On 4 Jan 2015, at 10:15, Cornelius Schumacher wrote:
On Saturday 03 January 2015 15:31:26 Ben Cooksley wrote:
(...excellent summary of discussion...)
Commentary on the above would be appreciated.
There are two questions which aren't addressed int he summary, but
which I
think are important
On 3 Jan 2015, at 18:37, Jan Kundrát wrote:
On Saturday, 3 January 2015 21:35:12 CEST, Jeff Mitchell wrote:
On 3 Jan 2015, at 14:00, Jan Kundrát wrote:
- Working on git trees, not patches. This directly translates into
making the contributors familiar with our workflow, and therefore
getting
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/121831/
---
Review request for KDE Base Apps and John Tapsell.
Repository: libksysgua
On Saturday 03 January 2015 15:31:26 Ben Cooksley wrote:
> (...excellent summary of discussion...)
>
> Commentary on the above would be appreciated.
There are two questions which aren't addressed int he summary, but which I
think are important to have good answers for before we can take a decisi
> On jun 14, 2014, 8:54 a.m., David Faure wrote:
> > What if the file isn't local?
> >
> > Sounds to me like the bug is elsewhere.
> >
> > Of course for local files, showing a local path looks better than a
> > file:/// URL, so this could be improved, but in a way that doesn't break
> > remot
Just to make sure -- I didn't write any of this, this is stuff that
committed users of Krita were coming up with some time ago when the
question arose of "why is krita not on github" (which got answered
satisfactorily, but then sequed in what people are missing).
On Sun, 4 Jan 2015, Boudewijn
On Sun, 4 Jan 2015, Thomas Friedrichsmeier wrote:
True, but don't forget about the other side of the story:
- potential contributors will have to learn more stuff, before they
can even _start_ contributing, which may be a real turn-off in some
cases.
Your project's situation may be very diffe
On Sun, 04 Jan 2015 00:37:49 +0100
Jan Kundrát wrote:
> My goal is to help bridge the gap between the existing project
> maintainers (who produce software in git trees) and the new
> contributors (who produce patches). If we can offload the management
> of git trees to the contributors, then the f
14 matches
Mail list logo
