On Monday, February 29, 2016 9:42:11 PM CET Sven Brauch wrote:
> Hey,
>
> On 02/28/2016 03:58 PM, Luigi Toscano wrote:
> > This is what I use:
> > export QT_QPA_PLATFORMTHEME=kde
> >
> > and you need the integration plugin installed. It used to be part of
> > Frameworks (frameworksintegration),
On Wednesday 02 March 2016 09:42:06 Martin Graesslin wrote:
> If you think Qt's default is too bad, improve Qt. If you think it needs a
> more generic qpt-plugin which can be used outside of Plasma: do it. But
> don't complain to people doing actual work.
^^This
--
Marco Martin
On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 9:42 AM, Martin Graesslin wrote:
> On Monday, February 29, 2016 9:42:11 PM CET Sven Brauch wrote:
> > Hey,
> >
> > On 02/28/2016 03:58 PM, Luigi Toscano wrote:
> > > This is what I use:
> > > export QT_QPA_PLATFORMTHEME=kde
> > >
> > > and you need the integration plugin i
On Wednesday, March 2, 2016 11:08:30 AM CET Mark Gaiser wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 9:42 AM, Martin Graesslin wrote:
> > On Monday, February 29, 2016 9:42:11 PM CET Sven Brauch wrote:
> > > Hey,
> > >
> > > On 02/28/2016 03:58 PM, Luigi Toscano wrote:
> > > > This is what I use:
> > > > expor
Hey,
On 03/02/2016 11:19 AM, Martin Graesslin wrote:
> No, because everything in the current plugin is Plasma specific.
Meh. In some kind of theoretical view you are right, I do see that.
Pragmatically, that's just not true, most of the things in the plugin
are not plasma specific at all, for exam
On Mittwoch, 2. März 2016 11:19:42 CEST, Martin Graesslin wrote:
On Wednesday, March 2, 2016 11:08:30 AM CET Mark Gaiser wrote:
On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 9:42 AM, Martin Graesslin
wrote: ...
What is that "kf5" plugin you talk of?
The origin of this thread was that the default Qt file dialog su
On 03/02/2016 11:56 AM, Thomas Lübking wrote:
> Imo that's a more issue: IPC is I/O, ie. unreliable. You cannot provide
> functionality that relies on working IPC, but hard-relying on it is bad
> design (nb. that the failing kded module make _every_ Qt client using
> QSystemTray unusable and trying
On Wednesday 02 March 2016 11:19:42 Martin Graesslin wrote:
>
> What is that "kf5" plugin you talk of? Sorry this just does not make sense.
> The plugin we have (and soon had) in frameworks is setting the defaults for
> Plasma. There are no generic defaults for frameworks. It just does not make
>
On Wednesday, March 2, 2016 11:46:01 AM CET Sven Brauch wrote:
> Hey,
>
> On 03/02/2016 11:19 AM, Martin Graesslin wrote:
> > No, because everything in the current plugin is Plasma specific.
>
> Meh. In some kind of theoretical view you are right, I do see that.
> Pragmatically, that's just not t
On Wednesday, March 2, 2016 12:09:17 PM CET Sven Brauch wrote:
> On 03/02/2016 11:56 AM, Thomas Lübking wrote:
> > Imo that's a more issue: IPC is I/O, ie. unreliable. You cannot provide
> > functionality that relies on working IPC, but hard-relying on it is bad
> > design (nb. that the failing kde
On Mittwoch, 2. März 2016 12:51:28 CEST, Martin Graesslin wrote:
On Wednesday, March 2, 2016 12:09:17 PM CET Sven Brauch wrote:
On 03/02/2016 11:56 AM, Thomas Lübking wrote: ...
Just saying: I wrote that SNI integration and I have never heard of that
problem before Sven mentioned it here.
T
11 matches
Mail list logo