Re: KDE file dialog

Hi, > Distributions set up distribution-wide "Sans", "Serif" and "Monospace" > aliases for a reason. The fonts are carefully selected by the distribution > based on a variety of criteria, including glyph coverage We tried to keep font decisions to distributions before Plasma 5 and it always

Re: Qt5 version of qimageblitz

On Sunday 06 March 2016 12:35:32 Albert Astals Cid wrote: > El Sunday 06 March 2016, a les 08:38:14, Boudhayan Gupta va escriure: > > On 6 March 2016 at 01:26, Martin Koller wrote: > > > Who is in charge of the old SVN repos ? > > > Who is in charge of qimageblitz ? > > > > I

Re: Qt5 version of qimageblitz

El Sunday 06 March 2016, a les 08:38:14, Boudhayan Gupta va escriure: > On 6 March 2016 at 01:26, Martin Koller wrote: > > Who is in charge of the old SVN repos ? > > Who is in charge of qimageblitz ? > > I asked around on IRC and it seems QIB is "community maintained" and > as

Re: KDE file dialog

On Sonntag, 6. März 2016 11:34:32 CEST, Martin Graesslin wrote: I don't know how often we have heard over the last decade that Plasma's look and feel is terribly because of fonts. I'd have assumed that'd be because of the freetype rasterizers being, errr ummm... shit (almost as shit as

Re: KDE file dialog

On Sunday, March 6, 2016 1:48:13 AM CET Kevin Kofler wrote: > Martin Graesslin wrote: > > No, because everything in the current plugin is Plasma specific. If we > > want to change the font, we will do so! > > Forcing a default font as you have done is a bad idea even on Plasma. It is > not the

Re: Policy regarding QtWebKit and QtScript

Hi, sorry for a somewhat bitter tone, I find it a bit hard to avoid(*): On Sat, 5 Mar 2016 11:37:48 +0100 Allan Sandfeld Jensen wrote: > On Saturday 05 March 2016, Thomas Lübking wrote: > > On Samstag, 5. März 2016 08:09:22 CEST, Thomas Friedrichsmeier > > wrote: > > >